Organising R&D Projects to Profit From Innovation: Insights From Co-opetition

Increasingly, technological innovation results from the joint creation effort of different players in the value chain, such as suppliers, customers, research centres and universities. Balancing co-operative and competitive forces in the innovation process to co-create value and to capture part of this value has become crucial to profit from innovation. In this article, we show that this tension between value creation and value capture is present in each R&D project. Drawing on the case of STMicroelectronics, we show that the balance of co-operative and competitive forces in R&D projects is made through the careful alignment of three variables: project knowledge attributes, project governance structure (internal development, co-operation or contracting), and project partner selection (firm or university). The capability to match these three elements explains the success of the innovation process of STMicroelectronics. Building on the experience of this firm, we provide some practical guidance on how managers should trade off these co-operative and competitive forces in organising their R&D projects.

[1]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[2]  Pierre Mohnen,et al.  Série Scientifique Scientific Series What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 What Type of Enterprise Forges Close Links with Universities and Government Labs? Evidence from Cis 2 , 2022 .

[3]  Albert N. Link,et al.  Universities as Research Partners , 2003 .

[4]  Martijn F. L. Rademakers,et al.  Concentration and inter‐firm co‐operation within the Dutch potato supply chain , 1998 .

[5]  B. Davies,et al.  The paradox of co‐operation and competition in strategic alliances: towards a multi‐paradigm approach , 2003 .

[6]  Lenos Trigeorgis,et al.  Strategic Options and Games in Analysing Dynamic Technology Investments , 2007 .

[7]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[8]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT MODE: A TRANSACTION COST CONCEPTUALIZATION , 1998 .

[9]  Giovanni Battista Dagnino,et al.  On the Nature and Drivers of Coopetition , 2005 .

[10]  A. James,et al.  The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change , 2003 .

[11]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[12]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[13]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  Relationship Dynamics between University Research Centers and Industrial Firms: Their Impact on Technology Transfer Activities , 2001 .

[14]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[15]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Knowledge as a Contingency Variable: Do the Characteristics of Knowledge Predict Organization Structure? , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[16]  Chung-Jen Chen The Effects of Knowledge Attribute, Alliance Characteristics, and Absorptive Capacity on Knowledge Transfer Performance , 2004 .

[17]  A. Palmer Co‐operation and competition: a Darwinian synthesis of relationship marketing , 2000 .

[18]  G. Pisano The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[19]  M. Delmas Exposing Strategic Assets to Create New Competencies: The Case of Technological Acquisition in the Waste Management Industry in Europe and North America , 1999 .

[20]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[21]  E. James Flynn,et al.  INNOVATION HISTORY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW ANALYSIS OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY INNOVATIONS. , 1995 .

[22]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[23]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries: A Dynamic Perspective and Integration , 2010 .

[24]  D. Jane Bower,et al.  Successful joint ventures in Science Parks , 1993 .

[25]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[26]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .