How Fast Should an Animal Run When Escaping? An Optimality Model Based on the Trade-Off Between Speed and Accuracy.

How fast should animals move when trying to survive? Although many studies have examined how fast animals can move, the fastest speed is not always best. For example, an individual escaping from a predator must run fast enough to escape, but not so fast that it slips and falls. To explore this idea, we developed a simple mathematical model that predicts the optimal speed for an individual running from a predator along a straight beam. A beam was used as a proxy for straight-line running with severe consequences for missteps. We assumed that success, defined as reaching the end of the beam, had two broad requirements: (1) running fast enough to escape a predator, and (2) minimizing the probability of making a mistake that would compromise speed. Our model can be tailored to different systems by revising the predator's maximal speed, the prey's stride length and motor coordination, and the dimensions of the beam. Our model predicts that animals should run slower when the beam is narrower or when coordination is worse.

[1]  Hannah J. Block,et al.  Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored? , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Paolo Domenici,et al.  The Visually Mediated Escape Response in Fish: Predicting Prey Responsiveness and the Locomotor Behaviour of Predators and Prey , 2002 .

[3]  Andrew H Hunter,et al.  Does individual quality mask the detection of performance trade-offs? A test using analyses of human physical performance , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Kinematics of quadrupedal locomotion in sugar gliders (Petaurus breviceps): effects of age and substrate size , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  J. Davis,et al.  Influence of lesion size and location on amphetamine-facilitated recovery of beam-walking in rats. , 1990, Behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  R. Hackert,et al.  Steady locomotion in dogs: temporal and associated spatial coordination patterns and the effect of speed , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  J. Husak Does speed help you survive? A test with Collared Lizards of different ages , 2006 .

[8]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Prey capture by the African lion , 1977 .

[9]  G. Dawson,et al.  The mouse beam walking assay offers improved sensitivity over the mouse rotarod in determining motor coordination deficits induced by benzodiazepines , 2005, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[10]  J. F. Yang,et al.  Human H-reflexes are smaller in difficult beam walking than in normal treadmill walking , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  High speed galloping in the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and the racing greyhound (Canis familiaris): spatio-temporal and kinetic characteristics , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  Sabine Renous,et al.  How does a mouse increase its velocity? A model for investigation in the control of locomotion , 2006 .

[13]  M. Schwab,et al.  Behavioral testing strategies in a localized animal model of multiple sclerosis , 2004, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[14]  S. Renous,et al.  Limb joints kinematics and their relation to increasing speed in the guinea pig Cavia porcellus (Mammalia: Rodentia) , 2005 .

[15]  Francesco Pappalardo,et al.  Mathematical modeling of biological systems , 2013, Briefings Bioinform..

[16]  D. Irschick,et al.  How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis , 2008 .

[17]  Robbie S Wilson,et al.  Running faster causes disaster: trade-offs between speed, manoeuvrability and motor control when running around corners in northern quolls (Dasyurus hallucatus) , 2015, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Barry Sinervo,et al.  Walking the Tight Rope: Arboreal Sprint Performance Among Sceloporus Occidentalis Lizard Populations , 1991 .

[19]  José Martín,et al.  Locomotor capacity and dominance in male lizards Lacerta monticola: a trade-off between survival and reproductive success? , 2002 .

[20]  A. Herrel,et al.  Out on a limb: the differential effect of substrate diameter on acceleration capacity in Anolis lizards , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  T. Garland Physiological correlates of locomotory performance in a lizard: an allometric approach. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  D. Miles,et al.  Locomotor performance and dominance in male Tree Lizards, Urosaurus ornatus , 2000 .

[23]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Moving beyond Curve Fitting: Using Complementary Data to Assess Alternative Explanations for Long Movements of Three Vulture Species , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[24]  M. Riley,et al.  Hit or miss: branch structure affects perch choice, behaviour, distance and accuracy of brown tree snakes bridging gaps , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The effects of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance of Anolis lizards , 1989 .

[26]  P. Aerts,et al.  SPEED AND STAMINA TRADE-OFF IN LACERTID LIZARDS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  E. Wajnberg,et al.  The effect of direct interspecific competition on patch exploitation strategies in parasitoid wasps , 2014, Oecologia.

[28]  M. Janssen,et al.  Benefits of Grouping and Cooperative Hunting Among Ache Hunter–Gatherers: Insights from an Agent-Based Foraging Model , 2014 .

[29]  J. Husak,et al.  Bite-Force Performance Predicts Dominance in Male Venerable Collared Lizards (Crotaphytus antiquus) , 2006, Copeia.

[30]  Olof Liberg,et al.  Predator-dependent functional response in wolves: from food limitation to surplus killing. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[31]  D. Nussey,et al.  What is individual quality? An evolutionary perspective. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  R. Brooks,et al.  Interactions among performance capacities predict male combat outcomes in the field cricket , 2010 .

[33]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Diurnal variation in flight performance and hence potential predation risk in small birds , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Webb Pw,et al.  The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo cairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. , 1976 .

[35]  Melissa L. Wynn,et al.  Sex-specific trade-offs and compensatory mechanisms: bite force and sprint speed pose conflicting demands on the design of geckos (Hemidactylus frenatus) , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[36]  H. Scheers,et al.  Morphology, performance and fighting capacity in male lizards, Gallotia galloti , 2005 .

[37]  J. Patel,et al.  Handbook of the normal distribution , 1983 .

[38]  5 Measuring Behavioral Energetics , .

[39]  H. Howland Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and manoeuvrability. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  O. E. Greenwald Thermal Dependence of Striking and Prey Capture by Gopher Snakes , 1974 .

[41]  M. Kasumovic,et al.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  Speers,et al.  Age differences in abilities to perform tandem stand and walk tasks of graded difficulty. , 1998, Gait & posture.

[44]  E. Thelen,et al.  The developmental origins of bimanual coordination: a dynamic perspective. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  S. Adolph,et al.  Estimating maximum performance: effects of intraindividual variation , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[47]  Tomer J Czaczkes,et al.  How to not get stuck-negative feedback due to crowding maintains flexibility in ant foraging. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  Bruce W. Grant,et al.  TRADE-OFFS IN ACTIVITY TIME AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PERFORMANCE FOR THERMOREGULATING DESERT , 1990 .

[49]  Daniel Koditschek,et al.  Quantifying Dynamic Stability and Maneuverability in Legged Locomotion1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[50]  J. Losos,et al.  The effect of perch diameter on escape behaviour of Anolis lizards : laboratory predictions and field tests , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  Alan M. Wilson,et al.  Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs , 2013, Nature.

[52]  N. C. Sharp,et al.  Timed running speed of a cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) , 1997 .

[53]  V. Polo,et al.  Coal tits, Parus ater, lose weight in response to chases by predators , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[54]  R. V. Damme,et al.  Speed versus manoeuvrability: association between vertebral number and habitat structure in lacertid lizards , 2002 .

[55]  R. Huey,et al.  Effects of Body Size and Slope on Acceleration of a Lizard (Stellio Stellio) , 1984 .

[56]  Amanda C. Niehaus,et al.  The fast and the fractalous: speed and tortuosity trade off in running ants , 2007 .

[57]  Tommy C. Blanchard,et al.  Monkeys Are More Patient in a Foraging Task than in a Standard Intertemporal Choice Task , 2015, PloS one.