Namdinator – automatic molecular dynamics flexible fitting of structural models into cryo-EM and crystallography experimental maps

Model building into experimental maps is a key element of structural biology, but can be both time consuming and error-prone. Here we present Namdinator, an easy-to-use tool that enables the user to run a Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting (MDFF) simulation in an automated manner through a pipeline system. Namdinator will modify an atomic model to fit within cryo-EM or crystallography density maps, and can be used advantageously for both the initial fitting of models, and for a geometrical optimization step to correct outliers, clashes and other model problems. We have benchmarked Namdinator against 39 deposited models and maps from cryo-EM and observe model improvements in 34 of these cases (87%). Clashes between atoms were reduced, and model-to-map fit and overall model geometry were improved, in several cases substantially. We show that Namdinator is able to model large scale conformational changes compared to the starting model. Namdinator is a fast and easy way to create suitable initial models for both cryo-EM and crystallography. It can fix model errors in the final steps of model building, and is usable for structural model builders at all skill levels. Namdinator is available as a web service (https://namdinator.au.dk), or can be run locally as a command-line tool. Synopsis A pipeline tool called Namdinator is presented that enables the user to run a Molecular Dynamics Flexible Fitting (MDFF) simulation in a fully automated manner, both online and locally. This provides a fast and easy way to create suitable initial models for both cryo-EM and crystallography and help fix errors in the final steps of model building.

[1]  Patrick Cramer,et al.  Nucleosome-Chd1 structure and implications for chromatin remodelling , 2017, Nature.

[2]  G. Schulz,et al.  Adenylate kinase motions during catalysis: an energetic counterweight balancing substrate binding. , 1996, Structure.

[3]  P. Chacón,et al.  Multi-resolution contour-based fitting of macromolecular structures. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  James C. Phillips,et al.  Parallel Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Calculations with NAMD. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  L. Christophorou Science , 2018, Emerging Dynamics: Science, Energy, Society and Values.

[6]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[7]  Leonardo G. Trabuco,et al.  Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: a practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. , 2009, Methods.

[8]  Jing Huang,et al.  CHARMM36 all‐atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data , 2013, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  R. Tampé,et al.  Structure of the human MHC-I peptide-loading complex , 2017, Nature.

[10]  Randy J. Read,et al.  Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological , 2003 .

[11]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[12]  Robert I Cukier,et al.  Molecular dynamics of apo-adenylate kinase: a principal component analysis. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[13]  W. Kühlbrandt The Resolution Revolution , 2014, Science.

[14]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  Prashant Rao,et al.  Cryo-EM Structures of the Magnesium Channel CorA Reveal Symmetry Break upon Gating , 2016, Cell.

[16]  G. Schulz,et al.  Structure of the complex between adenylate kinase from Escherichia coli and the inhibitor Ap5A refined at 1.9 A resolution. A model for a catalytic transition state. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.