Interoperability Progress and Remaining Data Quality Barriers of Certified Health Information Technologies

The Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture (C-CDA) is the primary standard for clinical document exchange in the United States. While document exchange is prevalent today, prior research has documented challenges to high quality, effective interoperability using this standard. Many electronic health records (EHRs) have recently been certified to a new version of the C-CDA standard as part of federal programs for EHR adoption. This renewed certification generated example documents from 52 health information technologies that have been made publicly available. This research applies automated tooling and manual inspection to evaluate conformance and data quality of these testing artifacts. It catalogs interoperability progress as well as remaining barriers to effective data exchange. Its findings underscore the importance of programs that evaluate data quality beyond schematron conformance to enable the high quality and safe exchange of clinical data.

[1]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Moving Past the EHR Interoperability Blame Game , 2017 .

[2]  Farzad Mostashari,et al.  The HITECH Era and the Path Forward. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) implementation of the Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record (VLER): Findings and lessons learned from Health Information Exchange at 12 sites , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Eric Poiseau,et al.  Model-based Analysis of HL7 CDA R2 Conformance and Requirements Coverage , 2015 .

[5]  I. Kohane,et al.  No small change for the health information economy. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  R H Dolin,et al.  Health Level Seven Interoperability Strategy: Big Data, Incrementally Structured , 2014, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  Are Meaningful Use Stage 2 certified EHRs ready for interoperability? Findings from the SMART C-CDA Collaborative , 2014, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Julia Adler-Milstein,et al.  Health information exchange policies of 11 diverse health systems and the associated impact on volume of exchange , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Dean F. Sittig,et al.  How the continuity of care document can advance medical research and public health. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[10]  Howard Goldberg,et al.  Taking advantage of continuity of care documents to populate a research repository , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Omar Bouhaddou,et al.  Data Quality and Interoperability Challenges for eHealth Exchange Participants: Observations from the Department of Veterans Affairs' Virtual Lifetime Electronic Record Health Pilot Phase. , 2014, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[13]  Adam Wright,et al.  What makes an EHR "open" or interoperable? , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Eric C. Pan,et al.  Veterans Health Administration Experience with Data Quality Surveillance of Continuity of Care Documents: Interoperability Challenges for eHealth Exchange Participants , 2015, AMIA.