Type synthesis of freedom and constraint elements for design of flexure mechanisms

Abstract. In this paper, we present the type synthesis of freedom and constraint elements for design of general flexure mechanisms. As an important step in the conceptual design stage, the goal of type synthesis is to qualitatively determine the topology or connectivity of flexure elements and rigid bodies in a mechanism. The synthesis procedure presented here is based on a recently emerging screw theory based approach for flexure mechanisms. We first categorize a list of commonly used atomic flexure primitives including blades, wires, notches and bellow springs etc. We then derive their twist and wrench matrices that mathematically represent their freedom and constraint spaces. The synthesis procedure rigorously follows screw algebra. Freedom elements including R-joints and P-joints are defined as basic motion elements that allow a single rotation or a single translation. By using parallel structures of these flexure primitives, eleven designs of R-joints and eight designs of P-joints are systematically synthesized. As a duality, constraint elements including P-constraints and R-constraints remove a single translation or rotation. In contract to freedom elements, we synthesized serial chains of flexure primitives and obtained six designs of P-constraints and three designs of R-constraints. These freedom and constraint elements form a catalogue of basic building blocks for designing more complex flexure mechanisms. At last we utilize four design examples to demonstrate how to synthesize hybrid structures with serial and parallel combination of these elements.

[1]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Design of flexure-based motion stages for mechatronic systems via Freedom, Actuation and Constraint Topologies (FACT) , 2010 .

[2]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Type Synthesis Principle and Practice of Flexure Systems in the Framework of Screw Theory: Part I—General Methodology , 2010 .

[3]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Synthesis of precision serial flexure systems using freedom and constraint topologies (FACT) , 2011 .

[4]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  A novel parallel-kinematics mechanism for integrated, multi-axis nanopositioning: Part 2: Dynamics, control and performance analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Hai-Jun Su Mobility Analysis of Flexure Mechanisms via Screw Algebra , 2011 .

[6]  Shorya Awtar,et al.  Constraint-based design of parallel kinematic XY flexure mechanisms , 2007 .

[7]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  Design of a six-axis micro-scale nanopositioner—μHexFlex , 2006 .

[8]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Interrelationship between screw systems and corresponding reciprocal systems and applications , 2001 .

[9]  Judy M. Vance,et al.  A Screw Theory Approach for the Conceptual Design of Flexible Joints for Compliant Mechanisms , 2009 .

[10]  Zhen Huang,et al.  A general methodology for mobility analysis of mechanisms based on constraint screw theory , 2009 .

[11]  Jonathan B. Hopkins Modeling and Generating New Flexure Constraint Elements , 2012 .

[12]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Design of parallel flexure systems via Freedom and Constraint Topologies (FACT) , 2007 .

[13]  Shorya Awtar,et al.  An XYZ Parallel Kinematic Flexure Mechanism With Geometrically Decoupled Degrees of Freedom , 2011 .

[14]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  Design of a low-cost nano-manipulator which utilizes a monolithic, spatial compliant mechanism , 2004 .

[15]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  A dual-purpose positioner-fixture for precision six-axis positioning and precision fixturing: Part I. Modeling and design , 2007 .

[16]  Dannis Michel Brouwer,et al.  Design and modeling of a six DOFs MEMS-based precision manipulator , 2010 .

[17]  Stuart T. Smith,et al.  Foundations of Ultra-Precision Mechanism Design , 2017 .

[18]  Layton Carter Hale,et al.  Principles and Techniques for Designing Precision Machines , 2013 .

[19]  Martin L. Culpepper,et al.  A dual-purpose positioner-fixture for precision six-axis positioning and precision fixturing: Part II. Characterization and calibration , 2007 .

[20]  Jack Phillips,et al.  Freedom in Machinery: Volume 1, Introducing Screw Theory , 1985 .

[21]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  A screw theory basis for quantitative and graphical design tools that define layout of actuators to minimize parasitic errors in parallel flexure systems , 2010 .

[22]  Xianwen Kong,et al.  Type Synthesis of Parallel Mechanisms , 2010, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[23]  Joseph K. Davidson,et al.  Robots and Screw Theory: Applications of Kinematics and Statics to Robotics , 2004 .

[24]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  A novel parallel-kinematics mechanisms for integrated, multi-axis nanopositioning: Part 1. Kinematics and design for fabrication , 2008 .

[25]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Type Synthesis Principle and Practice of Flexure Systems in the Framework of Screw Theory: Part III—Numerations and Synthesis of Flexure Mechanisms , 2010 .

[26]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  A Linear Algebraic Procedure in Obtaining Reciprocal Screw Systems , 2003, J. Field Robotics.

[27]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Corrigendum to Synthesis of multi-degree of freedom, parallel flexure system concepts via Freedom and Constraint Topology (FACT)—Part I: Principles , 2010 .

[28]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Kinematic geometry of mechanisms , 1978 .

[29]  Jonathan B. Hopkins,et al.  Synthesis of multi-degree of freedom, parallel flexure system concepts via freedom and constraint topology (FACT). Part II: Practice , 2010 .

[30]  Hai-Jun Su,et al.  Realizing Orthogonal Motions With Wire Flexures Connected in Parallel , 2010 .

[31]  Hai-Jun Su,et al.  ON LINE SCREW SYSTEMS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO FLEXURE SYNTHESIS , 2010 .