The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery.

BACKGROUND The relationship between surgeon and hospital procedure volumes and clinical outcomes in total joint arthroplasty has long fueled a debate over regionalization of care. At the same time, numerous policy initiatives are focusing on improving quality by incentivizing surgeons to adhere to evidence-based processes of care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the independent contributions of surgeon procedure volume, hospital procedure volume, and standardization of care on short-term postoperative outcomes and resource utilization in lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty. METHODS An analysis of 182,146 consecutive patients who underwent primary total joint arthroplasty was performed with use of data entered into the Perspective database by 3421 physicians from 312 hospitals over a two-year period. Adherence to evidence-based processes of care was defined by administration of appropriate perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, beta-blockade, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Patient outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, surgical complications, readmissions, and reoperations within the first thirty days after discharge. Hierarchical models were used to estimate the effects of hospital and surgeon procedure volume and process standardization on individual and combined surgical outcomes and length of stay. RESULTS After adjustment in multivariate models, higher surgeon volume was associated with lower risk of complications, lower rates of readmission and reoperation, shorter length of hospital stay, and higher likelihood of being discharged home. Higher hospital volume was associated with lower risk of mortality, lower risk of readmission, and higher likelihood of being discharged home. The impact of process standardization was substantial; maximizing adherence to evidence-based processes of care resulted in improved clinical outcomes and shorter length of hospital stay, independent of hospital or surgeon procedure volume. CONCLUSIONS Although surgeon and hospital procedure volumes are unquestionably correlated with patient outcomes in total joint arthroplasty, process standardization is also strongly associated with improved quality and efficiency of care. The exact relationship between individual processes of care and patient outcomes has not been established; however, our findings suggest that process standardization could help providers optimize quality and efficiency in total joint arthroplasty, independent of hospital or surgeon volume.

[1]  A David Paltiel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: patient risk and hospital volume. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  B. Morrey,et al.  Twenty-five-Year Survivorship of Two Thousand Consecutive Primary Charnley Total Hip Replacements: Factors Affecting Survivorship of Acetabular and Femoral Components , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Volume, Quality of Care, and Outcome in Pneumonia , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[4]  C. Rorabeck,et al.  Cost effectiveness of revision total knee replacement. , 1997, Instructional course lectures.

[5]  Martin Sipkoff.  Will pay for performance programs introduce a new set of problems? , 2004, Managed care.

[6]  Sheila Roman,et al.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Quality of Care for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[8]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Effects of hospital volume on life expectancy after selected cancer operations in older adults: a decision analysis. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[9]  Thomas R. Miller,et al.  What would be the effect of referral to high-volume hospitals in a largely rural state? , 2004, The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association.

[10]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Regional availability of high-volume hospitals for major surgery. , 2004, Health affairs.

[11]  Robert E Harbaugh,et al.  Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States. , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[12]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Relation of hospital volume to colostomy rates and survival for patients with rectal cancer. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Operative Mortality and Procedure Volume as Predictors of Subsequent Hospital Performance , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[14]  Elena Losina,et al.  Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: literature review. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery: a national study. , 2003, Archives of surgery.

[16]  P. Herberts,et al.  Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[17]  J. Pennington,et al.  Clinical Pathways in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A New Zealand Experience , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic surgery.

[18]  D. Berry,et al.  Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cruciate-Retaining Kinematic Condylar Prosthesis , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  Justin B Dimick,et al.  Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. , 2004, Surgery.

[20]  D. Bratzler,et al.  The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[21]  P. Choong,et al.  Clinical pathways in hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[22]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  R Poss,et al.  Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and Outcomes of Total Hip Replacement in the United States Medicare Population* , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[24]  P Herberts,et al.  Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register , 2001, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[25]  R. Chang,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip. , 1997, JAMA.

[26]  A. Auerbach.  Healthcare Quality Measurement in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current State of the Art , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  D. Markel,et al.  Success of Clinical Pathways for Total Joint Arthroplasty in a Community Hospital , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Lipid-lowering therapy and in-hospital mortality following major noncardiac surgery , 2004, JAMA.

[29]  J. Birkmeyer.  High-risk surgery--follow the crowd. , 2000, JAMA.

[30]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty survivorship in the United States Medicare population: effect of hospital and surgeon procedure volume. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  D. Fry.  Surgical site infections and the surgical care improvement project (SCIP): evolution of national quality measures. , 2008, Surgical infections.

[32]  P. Lindenauer,et al.  Perioperative beta-blocker therapy and mortality after major noncardiac surgery. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. , 2006, JAMA.

[34]  Caprice K. Christian,et al.  The Leapfrog Volume Criteria May Fall Short in Identifying High-Quality Surgical Centers , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[35]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Firm Specificity of Individual Performance: Evidence from Cardiac Surgery , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Michael H Huo,et al.  Are critical pathways and implant standardization programs effective in reducing costs in total knee replacement operations? , 2007, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[37]  P. Walsh.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[38]  Ricardo Pietrobon,et al.  Provider Volume of Total Knee Arthroplasties and Patient Outcomes in the HCUP-Nationwide Inpatient Sample. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[39]  C. Begg,et al.  Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume as Predictors of Outcome Following Rectal Cancer Resection , 2002, Annals of surgery.

[40]  J. Mabrey,et al.  Clinical pathway management of total knee arthroplasty. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  J. Maselli,et al.  Shop for Quality or Volume? Volume, Quality, and Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  J. Katz,et al.  Early failures of total hip replacement: effect of surgeon volume. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[43]  Constance K Haan,et al.  Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. , 2004, JAMA.

[44]  J. Mabrey,et al.  Outcomes assessment of total hip and total knee arthroplasty: critical pathways, variance analysis, and continuous quality improvement. , 1998, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[45]  Therese A. Stukel,et al.  Hospital Volume and Late Survival After Cancer Surgery , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[46]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[47]  Irene Fraser,et al.  Volume thresholds and hospital characteristics in the United States. , 2003, Health affairs.

[48]  S. Morshed,et al.  Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate new technologies in orthopaedics. The case of alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[49]  M. Ritter,et al.  Long-Term Followup of Nonmodular Total Knee Replacements , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[50]  R Adams Dudley,et al.  Pay-for-performance research: how to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know. , 2005, JAMA.

[51]  S. Maithel,et al.  Quality assessment in high-acuity surgery: volume and mortality are not enough. , 2007, Archives of surgery.

[52]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Volume and process of care in high‐risk cancer surgery , 2006, Cancer.

[53]  W. Henderson,et al.  The Case Against Volume as a Measure of Quality of Surgical Care , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[54]  Donald M Berwick,et al.  All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. , 2006, JAMA.

[55]  K. Bozic,et al.  Quality measurement and public reporting in total joint arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[56]  C. Begg,et al.  Surgeon volume compared to hospital volume as a predictor of outcome following primary colon cancer resection , 2003, Journal of surgical oncology.

[57]  Jane Barrett,et al.  Association of hospital and surgeon volume of total hip replacement with functional status and satisfaction three years following surgery. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[58]  I. Arostegui,et al.  Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[59]  K Vanhaecht,et al.  Effects of clinical pathways in the joint replacement: a meta-analysis , 2009, BMC medicine.

[60]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. , 2006, JAMA.

[61]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Effect of volume on total hip arthroplasty revision rates in the United States Medicare population. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.