Does Knowledge Contribute to the Acceptance of Demand Response

More flexible demand side would benefit the electricity markets, networks and sustainable power generation in many ways. The success of demand response programs, however, relies on consumer acceptance. This paper reviews previous studies about acceptability of different kinds of residential demand response programs. Furthermore, it discusses whether consumers who are more aware of the principles and benefits of demand response have more positive attitudes towards demand response programs. The results of the literature review and two survey studies suggest that price and security of supply are currently bigger motives to change consumption behaviour than environmental issues and that the savings expected to trigger any action (and to lead to lasting change in behaviour) may be relatively high. Therefore, the framing of demand response programs goals may affect the acceptance. Additionally, consumers seem to prefer simple price structures that remain constant for a long time to more dynamic options.

[1]  W. Fichtner,et al.  Smart Homes as a Means to Sustainable Energy Consumption: A Study of Consumer Perceptions , 2012 .

[2]  H. Allcott,et al.  Rethinking Real Time Electricity Pricing , 2011 .

[3]  Jussi Tuunanen,et al.  Rationality of supplier switching in retail electricity markets , 2013 .

[4]  Susan Lutzenhiser Beyond the Price Effect in Time-of-Use Programs: Results from a Municipal Utility Pilot, 2007-2008 , 2009 .

[5]  Paul Thorsnes,et al.  Consumer responses to time varying prices for electricity , 2012 .

[6]  S. Viljainen,et al.  Demand response from residential customers' perspective , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[7]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Household response to dynamic pricing of electricity: a survey of 15 experiments , 2010 .

[8]  Elisabeth Dütschke,et al.  Dynamic electricity pricing - Which programs do consumers prefer? , 2013 .

[9]  Torgeir Ericson,et al.  Households' self-selection of a dynamic electricity tariff , 2011 .

[10]  Susan Krumdieck,et al.  Price, environment and security: Exploring multi-modal motivation in voluntary residential peak demand response , 2011 .

[11]  F. Wolak Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment , 2007 .

[12]  S. Gyamfi,et al.  Residential peak electricity demand response—Highlights of some behavioural issues , 2013 .

[13]  Ian Richardson,et al.  Smart meter data: Balancing consumer privacy concerns with legitimate applications , 2012 .

[14]  Barbara R. Alexander Dynamic Pricing? Not So Fast! A Residential Consumer Perspective , 2010 .

[15]  S. Borenstein The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing , 2005 .

[16]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Quantifying Customer Response to Dynamic Pricing , 2005 .

[17]  Jin-ho Kim,et al.  Common failures of demand response , 2011 .