Drawing conclusions from data - The rough set way

In the rough set theory with every decision rule two conditional probabilities, called certainty and co erage factors, are associated. These two factors are closely related with the lower and the upper approximation of a set, basic notions of rough set theory. It is shown that these two factors satisfy the Bayes’ theorem. The Bayes’ theorem in our case simply shows some relationship in the data, without referring to prior and posterior probabilities intrinsically associated with Bayesian inference in our case and can be used Ž . to ‘‘inverse’’ decision rules, i.e., to find reasons explanation for decisions. 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  New Directions in Rough Sets, Data Mining, and Granular-Soft Computing , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Approximation Region-Based Decision Tables , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[3]  Andrzej Skowron Management of Uncertainty in AI: A Rough Set Approach , 1993, SOFTEKS Workshop on Incompleteness and Uncertainty in Information Systems.

[4]  Lech Polkowski,et al.  Rough Sets in Knowledge Discovery 2 , 1998 .

[5]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  Reasoning about Data - A Rough Set Perspective , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[6]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[7]  J. Grzymala-Busse Managing uncertainty in expert systems , 1991 .

[8]  Shusaku Tsumoto,et al.  Modelling Medical Diagnostic Rules Based on Rough Sets , 1998, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[9]  Zdzislaw Pawlak,et al.  Decision Rules, Bayes' Rule and Ruogh Sets , 1999, RSFDGrC.

[10]  Z. Pawlak,et al.  Rough membership functions , 1994 .