Distribution-free methods for multi-period, single-leg booking control

We study the multi-period, single-leg, fare class allocation problem in revenue management. Uncertainty in fare class demand is not characterized using probability distributions but by using lower and upper bounds on demand. Our multi-period model allows demand characteristics and available information to vary from period to period. Building on our previous work, static and dynamic models are developed to determine effective booking control policies based on competitive analysis of online algorithms. The underlying performance criterion used is a measure of robustness, which provides the best performance guarantee over all possible input sequences consistent with the data provided. The dynamic policies are nested by fare class in each period but the booking limits can be revised from period to period so that a fare class that is closed can be re-opened (if needed). Computational experiments compare the new policies against previously developed robust policies and also more traditional approaches. The experiments show that these new policies are effective, robust, and can provide significant gains over the existing policies.

[1]  Garud Iyengar,et al.  Robust Dynamic Programming , 2005, Math. Oper. Res..

[2]  Georgia Perakis,et al.  Robust Controls for Network Revenue Management , 2010, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[3]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  Sales Force Behavior, Pricing Information, and Pricing Decisions , 2015, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[4]  J. B. G. Frenk,et al.  The Role of Robust Optimization in Single-Leg Airline Revenue Management , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Huseyin Topaloglu,et al.  Robust Assortment Optimization in Revenue Management Under the Multinomial Logit Choice Model , 2012, Oper. Res..

[6]  Wolfgang Jank,et al.  An exploratory analysis of B2B price changes , 2012 .

[7]  Yingjie Lan,et al.  Analysis of seat allocation and overbooking decisions with hybrid information , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Garrett J. van Ryzin,et al.  Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Yingjie Lan,et al.  Regret in Overbooking and Fare-Class Allocation for Single Leg , 2011, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[10]  Susanne Albers,et al.  Online algorithms: a survey , 2003, Math. Program..

[11]  Andrew E. B. Lim,et al.  Relative Entropy, Exponential Utility, and Robust Dynamic Pricing , 2007, Oper. Res..

[12]  Peter P. Belobaba,et al.  Survey Paper - Airline Yield Management An Overview of Seat Inventory Control , 1987, Transp. Sci..

[13]  Maurice Queyranne,et al.  Toward Robust Revenue Management: Competitive Analysis of Online Booking , 2009, Oper. Res..

[14]  Shaler Stidham,et al.  The Underlying Markov Decision Process in the Single-Leg Airline Yield-Management Problem , 1999, Transp. Sci..

[15]  K. Talluri,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Revenue Management , 2004 .

[16]  Peter Belobaba,et al.  OR Practice - Application of a Probabilistic Decision Model to Airline Seat Inventory Control , 1989, Oper. Res..

[17]  Yuri Levin,et al.  Risk in Revenue Management and Dynamic Pricing , 2008, Oper. Res..

[18]  R. Phillips,et al.  Pricing and Revenue Optimization , 2005 .

[19]  Una McMahon-Beattie,et al.  Revenue Management and Pricing: Case Studies and Applications , 2003 .

[20]  Barry C. Smith,et al.  Yield Management at American Airlines , 1992 .

[21]  Yingjie Lan,et al.  Revenue Management with Limited Demand Information , 2008, Manag. Sci..