The social adaptation of mainstreamed mildly retarded children.

The purpose of the present study was to assess the social adaptation of mainstreamed mildly retarded children, comparing them to a matched sample of regular education students. Results indicated that mildly retarded children were quite rejected by their peers, and, compared to nonretarded classmates, they reported significantly more dissatisfaction and anxiety about their peer relations. With respect to behavioral style, there were no group differences in peer- or teacher-reported aggressiveness or disruptiveness. However, retarded children were perceived as more shy and avoidant, as less cooperative, and as less likely to exhibit leadership skills. Further analysis of the behavioral assessment data, via cluster analysis, revealed 2 subtypes of rejected retarded children: an internalizing group perceived as displaying high levels of shy/avoidant behavior and an externalizing group perceived as high in aggressive and/or disruptive behavior. In addition, the internalizing group reported higher social anxiety than did the externalizing group. Implications for school-based intervention research with mildly retarded children are discussed.

[1]  Steven R. Asher,et al.  Identifying Children Who Are Rejected by Their Peers. , 1986 .

[2]  S. Asher,et al.  Children's loneliness: a comparison of rejected and neglected peer status. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  S. Asher,et al.  Goals, Games, and Social Competence: Effects of Sex, Grade Level, and Sociometric Status. , 1985 .

[4]  Peter Renshaw,et al.  Loneliness in children. , 1984 .

[5]  J. Coie,et al.  A Behavioral Analysis of Emerging Social Status in Boys' Groups. , 1983 .

[6]  K. Dodge,et al.  Continuities and changes in children's social status: A five-year longitudinal study. , 1983 .

[7]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[8]  S. Harter.  The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. , 1982 .

[9]  John M. Gottman,et al.  An Interactional Model of Children's Entry into Peer Groups , 1981 .

[10]  C. E. Meyers,et al.  System-identification of mildly mentally retarded children: implications for interpreting and conducting research. , 1980, American journal of mental deficiency.

[11]  M. Marlowe.  The Games Analysis Intervention: A Procedure to Increase the Peer Acceptance and Social Adjustment of a Retarded Child. , 1979 .

[12]  D. Veldman,et al.  Correlates of social status among mainstreamed mentally retarded children. , 1978 .

[13]  J. Gottlieb,et al.  Improving the social status of mainstreamed retarded children. , 1977, Journal of educational psychology.

[14]  S. Asher,et al.  Peer preferences and social interaction among third-grade children in an integrated school district. , 1977 .

[15]  J. Gottlieb,et al.  Comparison of classroom behavior of special-class EMR, integrated EMR, low IQ, and nonretarded children. , 1974, American journal of mental deficiency.

[16]  W. Hartup,et al.  Peer reinforcement and sociometric status. , 1967, Child development.

[17]  W. Baldwin.  The social position of the educable mentally retarded child in the regular grades in the public schools , 1958 .

[18]  G. O. Johnson.  A study of the social position of mentally-handicapped children in the regular grades. , 1950, American journal of mental deficiency.

[19]  J. Ledingham,et al.  The Influence of the Evaluator on Assessments of Children’s Social Skills , 1985 .

[20]  J. Coie.  Fitting Social Skills Intervention to the Target Group , 1985 .

[21]  John A. Martin.  A longitudinal study of the consequences of early mother–infant interaction: A microanalytic approach. , 1981 .

[22]  C. Edelbrock,et al.  Behavioral problems and competencies reported by parents of normal and disturbed children aged four through sixteen. , 1981, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[23]  J. Gottlieb,et al.  Attitudes of teachers toward mainstreaming retarded children , 1980 .