Evaluation of stress distribution of porous tantalum and solid titanium implant-assisted overdenture in the mandible: A finite element study

Aims: The present study aimed to evaluate the stress distribution of porous tantalum implant and titanium solid implant assisted overdenture (IAO) in mandibular bone by utilizing three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) analysis. Materials and Methods: In this FE study, an existing cone-beam volumetric tomography scan of a patient without any maxillofacial anomaly with an available acceptable IAO for mandible was used to attain the compartments of a completely edentulous mandible. Zimmer trabecular implants and locator attachment systems were selected as the case group (Model B), and Zimmer Screw-Vent implants and locator attachment system were chosen for the control (Model A), as overdenture attachments in the present study. The mandibular overdenture was scanned and digitized as a FE model. Two 3D FE models were designed as edentulous lower jaws, each with four implants in the anterior section of the mandible. Three forms of loads were directed to the IAO in each model: Vertical loads on the left first molar vertical molar (VM). Vertical loads on the lower incisors (VI). Inclined force buccolingually applied at left first molar (IM). Results: Under all loading conditions, the maximum strain values in peri-implant bone in Model A were less than Model B. Under VI, the greatest stress value around abutments in both models was about 2–3 times higher than the other loads. Under VM and IM loads, no significant difference was observed between models. Conclusion: Using trabecular metal implants instead of solid implants reduces strain values around both cortical and trabecular bone.

[1]  G. Romanos,et al.  Influence of the implant diameter and bone quality on the primary stability of porous tantalum trabecular metal dental implants: an in vitro biomechanical study , 2018, Clinical oral implants research.

[2]  Chun-Li Lin,et al.  Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[3]  Yulu Wu,et al.  Remodeling of the Mandibular Bone Induced by Overdentures Supported by Different Numbers of Implants. , 2016, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Tolga Topkaya,et al.  The effect of implant number and position on the stress behavior of mandibular implant retained overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  J. Ata-Ali,et al.  Long-term survival rates of implants supporting overdentures. , 2015, The Journal of oral implantology.

[6]  C. Bao,et al.  The physicochemical/biological properties of porous tantalum and the potential surface modification techniques to improve its clinical application in dental implantology. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[7]  G. Raghoebar,et al.  Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient's satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. , 2015, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Mugan,et al.  Effect of attachment types and number of implants supporting mandibular overdentures on stress distribution: a computed tomography-based 3D finite element analysis. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Sompop Bencharit,et al.  Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants. , 2014, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[10]  V. Şahin,et al.  Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures. , 2014, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[11]  P. Bravetti,et al.  Interaction of bone-dental implant with new ultra low modulus alloy using a numerical approach. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[12]  F. Ghalichi,et al.  Effect of surface treatment on stress distribution in immediately loaded dental implants--a 3D finite element analysis. , 2014, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  V. Barão,et al.  Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Yubo Fan,et al.  Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2013, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão,et al.  Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[16]  N Wakabayashi,et al.  Nonlinear finite element analyses: advances and challenges in dental applications. , 2008, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  M. Sevimay,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  C. Misch,et al.  Dental Implant Prosthetics , 2004 .

[19]  M. Jeffcoat,et al.  The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[20]  M. Çehreli,et al.  The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses--a review. , 2002, Journal of dentistry.

[21]  G. Liu,et al.  Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. , 2001, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  G. van der Perre,et al.  Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog. , 1998, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[23]  G Preti,et al.  Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: finite element analysis of two anchorage systems. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[24]  A. Sertgöz,et al.  Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  J. M. Rocha,et al.  Locator® attachment system for implant overdentures: a systematic review. , 2017, Stomatologija.

[26]  M. Schlee,et al.  Immediate loading of trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants: interim results from an international proof-of-principle study. , 2015, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[27]  R. Akella,et al.  Outcome after placement of tantalum porous engineered dental implants in fresh extraction sockets: a canine study. , 2015, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[28]  R. Pocztaruk,et al.  Satisfaction level and masticatory capacity in edentulous patients with conventional dentures and implant-retained overdentures , 2006 .

[29]  Svatava Konvicková,et al.  Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.