Dual-Energy CT Vital Iodine Tumor Burden for Response Assessment in Patients With Metastatic GIST Undergoing TKI Therapy: Comparison to Standard CT and FDG PET/CT Criteria.

Background: CT-based criteria for assessing gastroinstestinal stromal tumor (GIST) response to tyroskine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy are limited partly because tumor attenuation is influenced by treatment-related changes including hemorrhage and calcification. Iodine concentration may be less impacted by such changes. Objective: To determine whether DECT vital iodine tumor burden (TB) provides improved differentiation between responders and non-responders in patients with metastatic GIST undergoing TKI therapy compared to established CT and PET/CT criteria. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom with spherical inserts mimicking GIST lesions of varying iodine concentrations and having non-enhancing central necrotic cores underwent DECT to determine a threshold iodine concentration. Forty patients (median age 57 years; 25 women, 15 men) treated with TKI for metaststic GIST were retrospectively evaluated. Patients underwent baseline and follow-up DECT and FDG PET/CT. Response assessment was performed using RECIST 1.1, modified Choi (mChoi), vascular tumor burden (VTB), DECT vital iodine TB, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC PET) criteria. DECT vital iodine TB used the same percentage changes as RECIST 1.1 response categories. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between responders and non-responders for each response criteria using Cox proportional hazard ratios and Harrell's c-indices. Results: The phantom experiment identified a 0.5 mg/mL threshold to differentiate vital from non-vital tissue. Using DECT vital iodine TB, median PFS was significantly different between non-responders and responders (587 vs 167 days, respectively; p=.02). Hazard ratio for progression for DECT vital iodine TB non-responders versus responders was 6.9, versus 7.6 for EORTC PET, 3.3 for VTB, 2.3 for RECIST 1.1, and 2.1 for mChoi. C-index was 0.74 for EORTC PET, 0.73 for DECT vital iodine TB, 0.67 for VTB, 0.61 for RECIST 1.1, and 0.58 for mChoi. C-index was significantly greater for DECT vital iodine TB than RECIST 1.1 (p=.02) and mChoi (p=.002), but not different than VTB and EORTC PET (p>.05). Conclusion: DECT vital iodine TB criteria showed comparable performance as EORTC PET and outperformed RECIST 1.1 and mChoi for response assessment of metastatic GIST under TKI therapy. Clinical Impact: DECT vital iodine TB could help guide early management decisions in patients on TKI therapy.