The consequences of adopting a MAIS 3 injury target for road safety in the EU: A comparison with targets based on fatalities and long-term consequences

It has been proposed in the European Union (EU) to adopt a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS) of 3 or greater as the basis for a road safety target. To have a common definition of serious injury across the EU is in itself very positive. In this study, fatalities, MAIS 3+, MAIS 2+ and injuries leading to permanent medical impairment (PMI) were used to identify problem scenarios. A national data set of injuries reported to Swedish hospitals from 2007 to 2012 (STRADA) was used. Police-reported injuries were also taken into account. The results showed that, depending on the data source and injury rating method, problem scenarios differed substantially. While fatalities were dominated by vehicle occupants in high-speed environments, vulnerable road users in urban areas were in greater focus as a result of lowered thresholds for injury or impairment levels. Bicyclists in particular have many injuries at less severe, yet significant, levels. There is a particular need to consider certain diagnoses which lead, relatively often, to long-term consequences at the AIS 1 level. To achieve a better injury and consequence scenario, data from the medical system are an essential prerequisite.

[1]  N N Sze,et al.  Association between setting quantified road safety targets and road fatality reduction. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  Emmanuelle Amoros,et al.  Under-reporting of road crash casualties in France. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  C. Tingvall,et al.  Risk of permanent medical impairment (RPMI) in road traffic accidents. , 2008, Annals of advances in automotive medicine. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. Annual Scientific Conference.

[4]  R Elvik,et al.  Quantified road safety targets: a useful tool for policy making? , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  S. Suissa,et al.  The effect of socio-demographic and crash-related factors on the prognosis of whiplash. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  R Fredriksson,et al.  How crash severity in rear impacts influences short- and long-term consequences to the neck. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Anders Lie,et al.  Managing trafic safety : an approach to the evaluation of new vehicle safety systems , 2012 .

[8]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  Safe system: comparisons of this approach in Australia , 2011 .

[9]  C. Tingvall,et al.  The properties of Safety Performance Indicators in target setting, projections and safety design of the road transport system. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  J Breen,et al.  Implementing the recommendations of the world report on road traffic injury prevention : country guidelines for the conduct of road safety management capacity reviews and the specification of lead agency reforms, investment strategies, and safe system projects , 2004 .