A Value Based Approach to Organization Types: Towards a coherent set of stakeholder-oriented management tools

This paper describes a set of ideal type organizations in a developmental sequence. As these descriptions are based on Spiral Dynamics (or Emerging Cyclical Levels of Existence Theory – ECLET), the types are labeled as Order, Success, Community and Synergy. Per type the author elaborated on the underlying value system and relating institutional structures, such as leadership role, governance and measurement format. As a summary, a Transition Matrix is presented which indicate the paradigm shifts per discipline/department, as manifested in the subsequent ideal type organizations. As Order and Success generally describe the majority of corporations in Western Economies, the latter two types introduce new approaches to more innovative – and more sustainable/responsible – ways to doing business. Based on Community Values, the author introduces a new measurement format which is the foundation for a systemic and coherent set of management tools to be used in a stakeholder approach. These tools relate to the strategic, tactical and operational tasks of management and have been developed by researchers of the European Corporate Sustainability Framework (ECSF) consortium. The set includes two tools which are generic: the Strategic Sustainability Scan (Strategy) and the Sustainability Matrix, which is a self-assessment tool (tactics). Three operational tools are context and industry specific: These are the Community related Responsive Business Scorecard (RBS) and Benchmark Format for measuring and monitoring sustainability performance and a methodology – a Management Information System – to generate information on people, planet and profit in order to provide data for the set of key performance indicators.

[1]  Frans van der Woerd,et al.  Industry Specific Sustainability Benchmarks: An ECSF Pilot Bridging Corporate Sustainability with Social Responsible Investments , 2004 .

[2]  T. Hardjono,et al.  Introduction on the European Corporate Sustainability Framework (ECSF) , 2004 .

[3]  Frans van der Woerd,et al.  Feasibility of a Responsive Business Scorecard – a pilot study , 2004 .

[4]  M. V. Marrewijk,et al.  Human Capital Management , 2002 .

[5]  A. Maslow.  Toward a Psychology of Being , 1962 .

[6]  M. Kaptein,et al.  The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity , 2002 .

[7]  Joanna G. Timmers,et al.  Human Capital Management: New Possibilities in People Management , 2003 .

[8]  T. Hardjono,et al.  The Social Dimensions of Business Excellence , 2001 .

[9]  M. V. Marrewijk,et al.  European corporate sustainability framework for managing complexity and corporate transformation , 2003 .

[10]  K. Wilber.  A Theory of Everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality , 2001 .

[11]  Marcel van Marrewijk,et al.  Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability , 2003 .

[12]  James C. Collins,et al.  Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies , 1994 .

[13]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action , 1996 .

[14]  M. V. Marrewijk,et al.  The Social Dimension of Organizations: Recent experiences with Great Place to Work® assessment practices , 2004 .

[15]  Teun W. Hardjono,et al.  European Corporate Sustainability Framework for Managing Complexity and Corporate Transformation , 2003 .

[16]  M. V. Marrewijk,et al.  The Hidden Hand of Cultural Governance: The Transformation Process of Humanitas, a Community-driven Organization Providing, Cure, Care, Housing and Well-being to Elderly People , 2004 .