Spatial Interpolation and Sample Size Optimization for Soil Copper (Cu) Investigation in Cropland Soil at County Scale Using Cokriging

Abstract Knowledge on spatial distribution and sampling size optimization of soil copper (Cu) could lay solid foundations for environmetal quality survey of agricultural soils at county scale. In this investigation, cokriging method was used to conduct the interpolation of Cu concentraiton in cropland soil in Shuangliu County, Sichuan Province, China. Based on the original 623 physicochmically measured soil samples, 560, 498, and 432 sub-samples were randomly selected as target variable and soil organic matter (SOM) of the whole original samples as auxiliary variable. Interpolation results using Cokriging under different sampling numbers were evaluated for their applicability in estimating the spatial distribution of soil Cu at county sacle. The results showed that the root mean square error (RMSE) produced by Cokriging decreased from 0.9 to 7.77%, correlation coefficient between the predicted values and the measured increased from 1.76 to 9.76% in comparison with the ordinary Kriging under the corresponding sample sizes. The prediction accuracy using Cokriging was still higher than original 623 data using ordinary Kriging even as sample size reduced 10%, and their interpolation maps were highly in agreement. Therefore, Cokriging was proven to be a more accurate and economic method which could provide more information and benefit for the studies on spatial distribution of soil pollutants at county scale.

[1]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science , 2001 .

[2]  Michel Mench,et al.  Evaluation of hydroxyapatite as a metal immobilizing soil additive for the remediation of polluted soils. Part 1. Influence of hydroxyapatite on metal exchangeability in soil, plant growth and plant metal accumulation , 1999 .

[3]  Sun Ying,et al.  STUDY ON PROGRESS OF METHODS IN GEOSTATISTICS , 2004 .

[4]  Yong-guan Zhu,et al.  Health risks of heavy metals in contaminated soils and food crops irrigated with wastewater in Beijing, China. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[5]  Z. Shi,et al.  Improved Prediction and Reduction of Sampling Density for Soil Salinity by Different Geostatistical Methods , 2007 .

[6]  J. Duxbury,et al.  Spatial variability of arsenic concentration in soils and plants, and its relationship with iron, manganese and phosphorus. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[7]  Ross M. Welch,et al.  Kriging on highly skewed data for DTPA-extractable soil Zn with auxiliary information for pH and organic carbon , 2006 .

[8]  David G. Hopkins,et al.  Improved Prediction and Mapping of Soil Copper by Kriging with Auxiliary Data for Cation-Exchange Capacity , 2003 .

[9]  Jianming Xu,et al.  Characterizing the risk assessment of heavy metals and sampling uncertainty analysis in paddy field by geostatistics and GIS. , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[10]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  Heavy metals in European soils: A geostatistical analysis of the FOREGS geochemical database , 2008 .

[11]  Haibo Zhang,et al.  Statistical and geoestatistical characterization of heavy metal concentrations in a contaminated area taking into account soil map units , 2008 .

[12]  Hong Li,et al.  Spatial Patterns of Soil Heavy Metals in Urban-Rural Transition Zone of Beijing , 2006 .