Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English

Abstract The covariation of onset f0 with voice onset time (VOT) was examined across and within phonological voicing categories in two languages, English and Spanish. The results showed a significant co-dependency between onset f0 and VOT across phonological voicing categories but not within categories, in both languages. Thus, English short lag and long lag VOT stops, which contrast phonologically, were found to differ significantly in onset f0. Similarly, Spanish short lag and lead VOT tokens are phonologically contrastive and also differed significantly in terms of onset f0. In contrast, English short lag and lead VOT stops, which are sub-phonemic variants of the same phonological category, did not differ in terms of onset f0. These results highlight the importance of phonological factor in determining the pattern of covariation between VOT and onset f0.

[1]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  The influence of spelling on phonological encoding in word reading, object naming, and word generation , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  E. Ziegel.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing (2nd ed.) , 2005 .

[3]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Is fundamental frequency a cue to aspiration in initial stops? , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[5]  Eric Oglesbee.  Multidimensional stop categorization in English, Spanish, Korean, Japanese, and Canadian French , 2008 .

[6]  R. Diehl,et al.  Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: Intermediate properties in the perception of distinctive feature values , 1995 .

[7]  Fernando Llanos,et al.  Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Ohala,et al.  Phonetic Explanations for the Development of Tones , 1979 .

[9]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Word-boundary-related duration patterns in English , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[10]  B. Rapp,et al.  Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production , 2007, Cognition.

[11]  W. Jassem,et al.  Neutralization of voicing in Polish obstruents , 1989 .

[12]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[13]  L. Gerstman,et al.  The Perception of English Stops by Speakers of English, Spanish. Hungarian, and Thai: A Tape-Cutting Experiment , 1960 .

[14]  Randy L. Diehl,et al.  Effects of fundamental frequency on medial and final [voice] judgments , 1996 .

[15]  A. Lotto,et al.  Influence of fundamental frequency on stop-consonant voicing perception: a case of learned covariation or auditory enhancement? , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Auditory enhancement and second language experience in Spanish and English weighting of secondary voicing cues. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  N. Umeda.  Influence of segmental factors on fundamental frequency in fluent speech , 1981 .

[18]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[19]  P. Keating,et al.  Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops , 1983 .

[20]  John Kingston,et al.  Phonetic Knowledge , 2015 .

[21]  Yi Xu,et al.  Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation , 2005, J. Phonetics.

[22]  John Kingston.  Segmental influences on F0: Automatic or controlled? , 2007 .

[23]  N. Umeda.  Consonant duration in American English , 1977 .

[24]  L. Raphael.  Acoustic Cues to the Perception of Segmental Phonemes , 2008, The Handbook of Speech Perception.

[25]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Accuracy and variability of acoustic measures of voicing onset. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  John Drury.  Consonant types and tone in Siamese revisited , 1989 .

[27]  A Löfqvist,et al.  The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Yiya Chen,et al.  How does phonology guide phonetics in segment-f0 interaction? , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[29]  L. Lisker,et al.  In Qualified Defense of VOT , 1978, Language and speech.

[30]  Viktor Kharlamov,et al.  Incomplete Neutralization and Task Effects in Experimentally-elicited Speech: Evidence from the Production and Perception of Word-final Devoicing in Russian , 2012 .

[31]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages , 1999 .

[32]  L. Lisker,et al.  Letter: Is it VOT or a first-formant transition detector? , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Michelle Caisse.  Cross‐linguistic differences in fundamental frequency perturbation induced by voiceless unaspirated stops , 1981 .

[34]  Kiyoshi Honda,et al.  Automaticity vs. feature-enhancement in the control of segmental F0 , 2011 .

[35]  John Kingston,et al.  On the internal perceptual structure of distinctive features: The [voice] contrast , 2008, J. Phonetics.

[36]  A. House,et al.  The Influence of Consonant Environment upon the Secondary Acoustical Characteristics of Vowels , 1953 .

[37]  D H Whalen,et al.  FO gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  R. N. Ohde,et al.  Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Jean-Marie Hombert,et al.  Consonant types, vowel height and tone in Yoruba , 2010 .

[40]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[41]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm , 2003 .

[42]  M. Fourakis,et al.  On the ‘Incomplete Neutralization’ of German Final Obstruents , 1984 .

[43]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Orthographic vs. morphological incomplete neutralization effects , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[44]  Ramón Almela Pérez.  Frecuencias del español : diccionario y estudios léxicos y morfológicos , 2005 .

[45]  D H Whalen,et al.  Gradient Effects of Fundamental Frequency on Stop Consonant Voicing Judgments , 1990, Phonetica.

[46]  Christian E Stilp,et al.  Rapid efficient coding of correlated complex acoustic properties , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  Ching X. Xu,et al.  Effects of consonant aspiration on Mandarin tones , 2001, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[48]  Jean-Marie Hombert.  The Effect of Aspiration on the Fundamental Frequency of the Following Vowel , 1976 .

[49]  M. Haggard,et al.  Pitch as a voicing cue. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[50]  P. Keating.  PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING , 1984 .

[51]  G. Docherty.  The Timing of Voicing in British English Obstruents , 1992 .

[52]  R. Port,et al.  Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German , 1985 .

[53]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Some Basic Considerations in the Analysis of Intonation , 1960 .

[54]  Amanda A. Shultz.  Individual differences in cue weighting of stop consonant voicing in perception and production , 2011 .

[55]  Julia Kastner,et al.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 2005 .

[56]  Allard Jongman,et al.  The Raising Effect of Aspirated Prevocalic Consonants on F 0 in Taiwanese , 2009 .

[57]  B. Repp.  Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a speech mode of perception. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[58]  Kim E. A. Silverman,et al.  F₀ Segmental Cues Depend on Intonation: The Case of the Rise after Voiced Stops , 1986 .

[59]  Susan Eitelman,et al.  Matlab Version 6.5 Release 13. The MathWorks, Inc., 3 Apple Hill Dr., Natick, MA 01760-2098; 508/647-7000, Fax 508/647-7001, www.mathworks.com , 2003 .