ENSO-based climate variability affects water use efficiency of rainfed cotton grown in the southeastern USA

Abstract The El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-based climate variability can have a significant impact on crop production due to its effect on yield variation on space and time. The main objective of this study was to determine the impact of ENSO-based climate variability on water use efficiency (WUE) of rainfed cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) grown in the southeastern USA. Specific objectives were to determine the spatial and temporal variability of WUE of rainfed cotton as related to ENSO phases. The CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton model, previously calibrated and evaluated with observed data, was used to simulate seed yield and evapotranspiration of rainfed cotton for selected counties in Alabama, Florida, and Georgia for the period from 1950 to 2006. For each location, model simulations from nine planting dates were categorized into the ENSO phases using the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) index. Then, simulation outputs were used to calculate WUE as the ratio of cotton seed yield to crop evapotranspiration. For each location and planting date, normal values for WUE were obtained and deviations from normal for each ENSO phase were determined. Exploratory and nonparametric analyses were used to analyze the results. Our results suggest that WUE of rainfed cotton is differentially affected by ENSO. During El Nino years WUE deviations from normal tended to be negative for early planting dates but positive and larger for late planting dates, no tendency was found for the entire planting window during Neutral years. During La Nina years WUE deviations from normal tend to be positive and larger for early to mid planting dates, becoming smaller and negative for late planting dates. The stronger spatial dependence of WUE during La Nina years than during El Nino and Neutral years may imply that more attention should be given to planning strategies during La Nina years if we were to plan rainfed cotton in the region. Our results suggest that management practices of rainfed cotton tailored to ENSO-based climate variability are promising as a strategy for reducing the vulnerability of the crop to climate variability in the southeastern USA.

[1]  K. Mo,et al.  Relationships between ENSO and drought over the southeastern United States , 2008 .

[2]  C. Willmott.  Some Comments on the Evaluation of Model Performance , 1982 .

[3]  J. Delhomme.  Kriging in the hydrosciences , 1978 .

[4]  A. Konopka,et al.  FIELD-SCALE VARIABILITY OF SOIL PROPERTIES IN CENTRAL IOWA SOILS , 1994 .

[5]  David M. Legler,et al.  Impact of ENSO-Related Climate Anomalies on Crop Yields in the U.S. , 1999 .

[6]  Bruno Basso,et al.  Analyzing the effects of climate variability on spatial pattern of yield in a maize-wheat-soybean rotation , 2007 .

[7]  James W. Jones,et al.  ENSO Influences on Agriculture in the Southeastern United States , 1998 .

[8]  Marcello Mastrorilli,et al.  The effect of soil texture on the water use efficiency of irrigated crops: results of a multi-year experiment carried out in the Mediterranean region. , 2009 .

[9]  M. P. Bange,et al.  HydroLOGIC: An irrigation management system for Australian cotton , 2008 .

[10]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Climate variation and crop production in Georgia, USA, during the twentieth century , 2001 .

[11]  T. Howell.  Enhancing Water Use Efficiency in Irrigated Agriculture , 2001 .

[12]  J. Paz,et al.  Examples of strategies to analyze spatial and temporal yield variability using crop models , 2002 .

[13]  James W. Jones,et al.  USE OF GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR CROPGRO COTTON MODEL DEVELOPMENT , 2007 .

[14]  G. Uehara,et al.  Application of Geostatistics to Spatial Studies of Soil Properties , 1986 .

[15]  James W. Jones,et al.  El Niño-Southern Oscillation effects on peanut yield and nitrogen leaching , 2002 .

[16]  F. Meza.  Variability of reference evapotranspiration and water demands. Association to ENSO in the Maipo river basin, Chile , 2005 .

[17]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Modeling irrigation management strategies to maximize cotton lint yield and water use efficiency. , 2009 .

[18]  L. A. Hunt,et al.  Data for model operation, calibration, and evaluation , 1998 .

[19]  Luis S. Pereira,et al.  Regional analysis of irrigation water requirements using kriging: Application to potato crop (Solanum tuberosum L.) at Tras-os-Montes , 1999 .

[20]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Advances in irrigation , 1982 .

[21]  R. Cuenca,et al.  Analysis of Evapotranspiration as a Regionalized Variable , 1987 .

[22]  V. French,et al.  Estimating solar radiation for plant simulation models , 1985 .

[23]  Tim R. McVicar,et al.  Prediction of crop yield, water consumption and water use efficiency with a SVAT-crop growth model using remotely sensed data on the North China Plain , 2005 .

[24]  David B. Lobell,et al.  Regional importance of crop yield constraints: Linking simulation models and geostatistics to interpret spatial patterns , 2006 .

[25]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Agricultural water use estimation using geospatial modeling and a geographic information system , 2004 .

[26]  J. J. Carrera-Hernández,et al.  Spatio temporal analysis of daily precipitation and temperature in the Basin of Mexico , 2007 .

[27]  Richard E. Zartman,et al.  Exploring spatial dependence of cotton yield using global and local autocorrelation statistics , 2004 .

[28]  G. Hoogenboom.  Contribution of agrometeorology to the simulation of crop production and its applications , 2000 .

[29]  G. Hoogenboom,et al.  Understanding Options for Agricultural Production , 1998, Systems Approaches for Sustainable Agricultural Development.

[30]  James E. Hook,et al.  Irrigation water use estimates based on crop simulation models and kriging , 2007 .

[31]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  On the spatial scaling of soil moisture , 1999 .

[32]  Y. Bolek,et al.  Timing of planting is crucial for cotton yield , 2006 .

[33]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation , 2003 .

[34]  Wim G.M. Bastiaanssen,et al.  Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize , 2004 .

[35]  R. C. Nuti,et al.  Effect of Planting Date, Mepiquat Chloride, and Glyphosate Application to Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton , 2006 .

[36]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Water-Use Efficiency in Crop Production , 1984 .

[37]  Gerrit Hoogenboom,et al.  Impact of generated solar radiation on simulated crop growth and yield , 2008 .

[38]  James W. Jones,et al.  The DSSAT cropping system model , 2003 .

[39]  James W. Jones,et al.  Decision support system for agrotechnology transfer: DSSAT v3 , 1998 .

[40]  Gerrit Hoogenboom,et al.  Evaluation of FAO-56 crop coefficient procedures for deficit irrigation management of cotton in a humid climate , 2007 .

[41]  Gerrit Hoogenboom,et al.  Evaluation of an improved daily solar radiation generator for the southeastern USA , 2005 .

[42]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Modelling the effects of climate variability and water management on crop water productivity and water balance in the North China Plain , 2010 .

[43]  G. Matheron.  Principles of geostatistics , 1963 .

[44]  James W. Jones,et al.  Modeling cotton production response to shading in a pecan alleycropping system using CROPGRO , 2009, Agroforestry Systems.