A hybrid centralized-Distributed Mobility Management for supporting highly mobile users

Distributed Mobility Management (DMM) is a new trend to overcome the limitations of the current IP mobility management protocols raised by the rapid increasing mobile Internet usages. It is based on the idea of flattening the network architecture and providing mobility service when it is necessary. Although DMM outperforms the well known protocol - Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) in terms of optimizing the network resources consumption, the DMM deployment faces several challenges such as complex address and tunnel management, high signaling cost and high handover latency when the number of addresses and tunnels associated with the mobile node increase (e.g., in case of users moving at a high speed). For this reason, we introduce a hybrid centralized-distributed mobility management architecture (H-DMM) for supporting highly mobile users. The numerical results showed that H-DMM can retain the advantages of DMM while limiting its drawback in comparison with PMIPv6 in terms of signaling cost, packet delivery cost, handover latency and end-to-end delay even in case of users with highly mobility features.

[1]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[2]  Hidetoshi Yokota,et al.  Runtime Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2012, RFC.

[3]  H. Anthony Chan,et al.  Requirements for Distributed Mobility Management , 2012, RFC.

[4]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Performance Evaluation of IPv6-Based mobility Management Protocols , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  On the efficiency of dynamic multicast mobility anchor selection in DMM: Use cases and analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[6]  Antonio de la Oliva,et al.  Analytic Evaluation and Experimental Validation of a Network-Based IPv6 Distributed Mobility Management Solution , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[7]  Jouni Korhonen,et al.  Local Mobility Anchor (LMA) Discovery for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2011, RFC.

[8]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Considerations of IP multicast for load balancing in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[9]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Performance optimization of multicast content delivery in a Mobile environment based on PMIPv6 , 2013, 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[10]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Distributed IP mobility management from the perspective of the IETF: motivations, requirements, approaches, comparison, and challenges , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[11]  Hidetoshi Yokota,et al.  Runtime LMA Assignment Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2009 .

[12]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Dynamic tunneling for network-based distributed mobility management coexisting with PMIPv6 , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC).

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  An inter-system handoff technique for the IMT-2000 system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[14]  Tien Thinh Nguyen,et al.  Optimization of mobility mechanisms for IP-based multicast flows , 2014 .

[15]  Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.  Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol , 2005, RFC.

[16]  Tai-Myung Chung,et al.  How much do we gain by introducing route optimization in Proxy Mobile IPv6 networks? , 2010, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[17]  C. B. Sankaran,et al.  Data offloading techniques in 3GPP Rel-10 networks: A tutorial , 2012, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[18]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.