Sparse placement of electronic switching nodes for low blocking in translucentoptical networks

We evaluate the performance of optical network designs using relatively few switch nodes at which wavelength conversion and electronic regeneration is possible. A simple heuristic for placing the fewest such nodes to reach a given blocking probability is based on the ranked frequency of shortest-path routes transiting each node. This strategy is found to be efficient in designing a translucent optical network with sparse electronic switch placement that performs very close in blocking to that of an opaque optical network. In addition, we apply a new two-dimensional Dijkstra algorithm for routing and wavelength assignment in the resultant translucent optical network. Simulation results indicate that a translucent optical network with sparse electronic switch placement based on the heuristic has much lower blocking than a fully transparent optical network when the constraint of the maximum transparent distance before regeneration is also considered. Moreover, when the switches are placed according to the heuristic, lightpath blocking can approach that of a fully opaque network with significantly fewer total electronic switches. In our results, lightpath blocking as low as that with the fully opaque network case was obtained with electronic switches selectively placed at approximately one node in three on average. The heuristic also performs well against random searching for an effective subset of electronic switch nodes and performs better than a prior optimal method that is based on a combinatorially exhaustive search and that is limited to assuming fixed shortest-path routing.

[1]  Chao Lu,et al.  Efficient heuristic algorithms for light-path routing and wavelength assignment in WDM networks under dynamically varying loads , 2001, Comput. Commun..

[2]  Debasish Datta,et al.  Impact of transmission impairments on the teletraffic performance of wavelength-routed optical networks , 1999 .

[3]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Lightpath (Wavelength) Routing in Large WDM Networks , 1996, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[4]  E. Iannone Wavelength conversion and routing strategies in opaque optical networks , 1998, Conference Proceedings. LEOS'98. 11th Annual Meeting. IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society 1998 Annual Meeting (Cat. No.98CH36243).

[5]  J.P. Heritage,et al.  Transparent vs. opaque vs. translucent wavelength-routed optical networks , 1999, OFC/IOOC . Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 1999, and the International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication.

[6]  K. R. Venugopal,et al.  A heuristic for placement of limited range wavelength converters in all-optical networks , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).

[7]  Chien-Chung Shen,et al.  Connection management for multiwavelength optical networking , 1998, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[8]  Jennifer Yates,et al.  Limited-range wavelength translation in all-optical networks , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '96. Conference on Computer Communications.

[9]  Suresh Subramaniam,et al.  All-optical networks with sparse wavelength conversion , 1996, TNET.

[10]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Lightpath communications: an approach to high bandwidth optical WAN's , 1992, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  Suresh Subramaniam,et al.  On the optimal placement of wavelength converters in wavelength-routed networks , 1998, Proceedings. IEEE INFOCOM '98, the Conference on Computer Communications. Seventeenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Gateway to the 21st Century (Cat. No.98.

[12]  Arun K. Somani,et al.  An efficient algorithm for optimal wavelength converter placement on wavelength-routed networks with arbitrary topologies , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).

[13]  B. Mukherjee,et al.  Architectures and algorithm for multicasting in WDM optical mesh networks using opaque and transparent optical cross-connects , 2001, OFC 2001. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest Postconference Edition (IEEE Cat. 01CH37171).

[14]  V. Li,et al.  A Wavelength-Convertible Optical Network , 1993 .