A generalizable adaptive brain-machine interface design for control of anesthesia

Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) for closed-loop control of anesthesia have the potential to automatically monitor and control brain states under anesthesia. Since a variety of anesthetic states are needed in different clinical scenarios, designing a generalizable BMI architecture that can control a wide range of anesthetic states is essential. In addition, drug dynamics are non-stationary over time and could change with the depth of anesthesia. Hence for precise control, a BMI needs to track these non-stationarities online. Here we design a BMI architecture that generalizes to control of various anesthetic states and their associated neural signatures, and is adaptive to time-varying drug dynamics. We provide a systematic approach to build general parametric models that quantify the anesthetic state and describe the drug dynamics. Based on these models, we develop an adaptive closed-loop controller within the framework of stochastic optimal feedback control. This controller tracks the non-stationarities in drug dynamics, achieves tight control in a time-varying environment, and removes the need for an offline system identification session. For robustness, the BMI also ensures small drug infusion rate variations at steady state. We test the BMI architecture for control of two common anesthetic states, i.e., burst suppression in medically-induced coma and unconsciousness in general anesthesia. Using numerical experiments, we find that the BMI generalizes to control of both these anesthetic states; in a time-varying environment, even without initial knowledge of model parameters, the BMI accurately controls these two different anesthetic states, reducing bias and error more than 70 times and 9 times, respectively, compared with a non-adaptive system.

[1]  J. Agarwal,et al.  Comparison of closed loop vs. manual administration of propofol using the Bispectral index in cardiac surgery , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  Peter S A Glass Automated control of anesthesia ten years later: futuristic novelty or present day reality , 2010, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[3]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Yuxiao Yang,et al.  An adaptive brain-machine interface algorithm for control of burst suppression in medical coma , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[5]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  A Brain-Machine Interface for Control of Medically-Induced Coma , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[6]  Emery N Brown,et al.  A closed-loop anesthetic delivery system for real-time control of burst suppression , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  H Schwilden,et al.  Closed‐loop Feedback Control of Methohexital Anesthesia by Quantitative EEG Analysis in Humans , 1987, Anesthesiology.

[8]  Morgan Le Guen,et al.  Feasibility of Closed-loop Titration of Propofol and Remifentanil Guided by the Spectral M-Entropy Monitor , 2012, Anesthesiology.

[9]  Julien Bogousslavsky,et al.  Propofol Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Study of 31 Episodes , 2004, Epilepsia.

[10]  G D Puri,et al.  Closed-Loop Anaesthesia Delivery System (CLADSTM) using Bispectral Index: A Performance Assessment Study , 2007, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[11]  ShiNung Ching,et al.  Real-time Closed-loop Control in a Rodent Model of Medically Induced Coma Using Burst Suppression , 2013, Anesthesiology.