Extending the Activity Cliff Concept: Structural Categorization of Activity Cliffs and Systematic Identification of Different Types of Cliffs in the ChEMBL Database

Activity cliffs are generally understood as pairs or groups of similar compounds with large differences in potency. The study of activity cliffs is of high interest for the characterization of activity landscapes of compound data sets and the identification of SAR determinants, given the "small chemical change(s)-large potency effect" phenotype of cliffs. Herein, we introduce a new structural classification scheme for activity cliffs and introduce new cliff types. Activity cliffs are divided into five different classes dependent on whether the participating compounds are only distinguished by chirality, topology, R-group sets, core structures (scaffolds), or core structures and R-group topology. All cliff types are frequently detected in the ChEMBL database. R-group cliffs occur with higher propensity than other cliff types, as one might expect. However, many scaffold and R-group cliffs are not identified on the basis of whole-molecule similarity calculations, although they are often chemically intuitive. This makes the activity cliff classification attractive for medicinal chemistry analysis, independent of similarity calculations. Assignment of activity cliffs on the basis of well-defined structural criteria complements and further extends current approaches to identify and represent cliffs.

[1]  David Rogers,et al.  Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Molecular similarity analysis uncovers heterogeneous structure-activity relationships and variable activity landscapes. , 2007, Chemistry & biology.

[3]  Rajarshi Guha,et al.  Structure-Activity Landscape Index: Identifying and Quantifying Activity Cliffs , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[4]  P. Willett Searching techniques for databases of two- and three-dimensional chemical structures. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Exploring activity cliffs in medicinal chemistry. , 2012, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  G. Bemis,et al.  The properties of known drugs. 1. Molecular frameworks. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  John P. Overington,et al.  ChEMBL: a large-scale bioactivity database for drug discovery , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Gerald M. Maggiora,et al.  On Outliers and Activity Cliffs-Why QSAR Often Disappoints , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[9]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Assessing the Confidence Level of Public Domain Compound Activity Data and the Impact of Alternative Potency Measurements on SAR Analysis , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[10]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of Single‐ and Multi‐Target Activity Cliffs Formed by Currently Available Bioactive Compounds , 2011, Chemical biology & drug design.

[11]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Exploration of 3D Activity Cliffs on the Basis of Compound Binding Modes and Comparison of 2D and 3D Cliffs , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[12]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  From Activity Cliffs to Activity Ridges: Informative Data Structures for SAR Analysis , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[13]  Mathias Wawer,et al.  Navigating structure-activity landscapes. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[14]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Searching for Coordinated Activity Cliffs Using Particle Swarm Optimization , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[15]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Algorithm for Naming Molecular Equivalence Classes Represented by Labeled Pseudographs , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[16]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Activity landscape representations for structure-activity relationship analysis. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Chemical Substitutions That Introduce Activity Cliffs Across Different Compound Classes and Biological Targets , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[18]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  MMP-Cliffs: Systematic Identification of Activity Cliffs on the Basis of Matched Molecular Pairs , 2012, J. Chem. Inf. Model..