Assessing Accessibility of Dockless Sharing-Bike Networks by the Social Network Analysis Method

Dockless sharing bikes play an increasingly significant role in transit transfer, especially for the first/last mile. However, it is not always accessible for users to find sharing bicycles. The objective of this paper is to assess the accessibility of dockless sharing bikes from a network perspective, which would provide a decision-making basis not only for potential bike users but also for urban planners, policymakers, and bicycle suppliers to optimize sharing-bike systems. Considering bicycle travel characteristics, a hierarchical clustering algorithm was applied to construct the dockless sharing-bike network. The social network analysis (SNA) method was adopted to assess the accessibility of the bike network. Then, a spatial interaction model was chosen to conduct a correlation analysis to compare the accessibility obtained from the SNA approach. The case study of Shanghai indicates a strong connection between the accessibility and the SNA indicators with the correlation coefficient of 0.779, which demonstrates the feasibility of the proposed method. This paper contributes to a deep understanding of dockless sharing-bike network accessibility since the SNA approach considers both the interaction barriers and the network structure of a bicycle network. The developed methodology requires fewer data and is easy to operate. Thus, it can serve as a tool to facilitate the smart management of sharing bikes for improving a sustainable transportation system.

[1]  D. Ettema,et al.  Dockless bike-sharing systems: what are the implications? , 2020, Transport Reviews.

[2]  J. Scheiner,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of bike-sharing use in Cologne taking into account a public transit disruption , 2021 .

[3]  M. Wachs,et al.  PHYSICAL ACCESSIBILITY AS A SOCIAL INDICATOR , 1973 .

[4]  Cyril Ray,et al.  A spatio-temporal modelling approach for the study of the connectivity and accessibility of the Guangzhou metropolitan network , 2014 .

[5]  Peter G Furth,et al.  A cycling-focused accessibility tool to support regional bike network connectivity , 2020 .

[6]  R. Hulst Introduction to Social Network Analysis (SNA) as an investigative tool , 2009 .

[7]  Giuseppe Inturri,et al.  Accessibility and Centrality for Sustainable Mobility: Regional Planning Case Study , 2013 .

[8]  W. G. Hansen How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[9]  Heng Wei,et al.  First-and-last mile solution via bicycling to improving transit accessibility and advancing transportation equity , 2020 .

[10]  P. Alam ‘N’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[11]  Michael Batty,et al.  Accessibility: In Search of a Unified Theory , 2009 .

[12]  Islam H. El-adaway,et al.  Social Network Analysis Approach for Improved Transportation Planning , 2017 .

[13]  Rafael E. Banchs,et al.  Article in Press Pervasive and Mobile Computing ( ) – Pervasive and Mobile Computing Urban Cycles and Mobility Patterns: Exploring and Predicting Trends in a Bicycle-based Public Transport System , 2022 .

[14]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[15]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[16]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Analysis of Network Accessibility , 2015 .

[17]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Zheng Chang,et al.  Rethinking urban green space accessibility: Evaluating and optimizing public transportation system through social network analysis in megacities , 2015 .

[19]  J. Weibull An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility , 1976 .

[20]  Heng Wei,et al.  Determining transit service coverage by non-motorized accessibility to transit: Case study of applying GPS data in Cincinnati metropolitan area , 2018 .

[21]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Free-floating bike sharing: Solving real-life large-scale static rebalancing problems , 2017 .

[22]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Accessibility tradeoffs in public transit planning , 2003, J. Geogr. Syst..

[23]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1840, Microbial pathogenesis.

[24]  Diane M. Phillips,et al.  A social network analysis of business logistics and transportation , 1998 .

[25]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Betweenness-accessibility: Estimating impacts of accessibility on networks , 2020 .

[26]  James A. Pooler,et al.  THE USE OF SPATIAL SEPARATION IN THE MEASUREMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ACCESSIBILITY , 1995 .

[27]  T. Litman Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning , 2007 .

[28]  Xiaolu Zhou,et al.  Understanding Spatiotemporal Patterns of Biking Behavior by Analyzing Massive Bike Sharing Data in Chicago , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[30]  Nikola Markovic,et al.  Inferencing hourly traffic volume using data-driven machine learning and graph theory , 2021, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[31]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  Bikeshare: A Review of Recent Literature , 2016 .

[32]  Amila Jayasinghe,et al.  A Modeling Framework: To Analyze the Relationship between Accessibility, Land Use and Densities in Urban Areas , 2021 .

[33]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Measuring Nonmotorized Accessibility: Issues, Alternatives, and Execution , 2008 .

[34]  Gorjan Alagic,et al.  #p , 2019, Quantum information & computation.

[35]  P. Alam ‘G’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[36]  Manuel Wolff Taking one step further – Advancing the measurement of green and blue area accessibility using spatial network analysis , 2021, Ecological Indicators.

[37]  Yi Ai,et al.  A solution to measure traveler’s transfer tolerance for walking mode and dockless bike-sharing mode , 2019, The Journal of Supercomputing.