Rates and Risk Factors for Revision Open and Arthroscopic Proximal Biceps Tenodesis

Background: Biceps tenodesis may be performed for symptomatic tendinopathy or tearing of the long head of the biceps tendon. Biceps tenodesis is also commonly performed as an adjunctive procedure. However, the indications and prevalence of biceps tenodesis have expanded. Purpose: To establish the incidence and risk factors for revision biceps tenodesis. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The PearlDiver database of Humana patient data was queried for patients undergoing arthroscopic or open biceps tenodesis (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 29828 and CPT 23430, respectively) from 2008 through the first quarter of 2017. Patients without a CPT laterality modifier were excluded from analysis. Revision biceps tenodesis was defined as patients who underwent subsequent ipsilateral open or arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. The financial impact of revision biceps tenodesis was also calculated. Multivariate binomial logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for revision biceps tenodesis, such as patient demographics as well as concomitant procedures and diagnoses. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated, and all statistical comparisons with P < .05 were considered significant. Results: There were 15,257 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis. Of these, 9274 patients (60.8%) underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, while 5983 (39.2%) underwent open biceps tenodesis. A total of 171 patients (1.8%) and 111 patients (1.9%) required revision biceps tenodesis after arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis, respectively (P = .5). Male sex (OR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.04-1.85]; P = .02) was the only independent risk factor for revision biceps tenodesis after the index open biceps tenodesis. After arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, age >45 years (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.39-0.89]; P = .01) and concomitant rotator cuff tear (OR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.47-0.71]; P < .001) were independent protective factors for revision biceps tenodesis. The total cost of revision biceps tenodesis after open and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis was US$3427.95 and US$2174.33 per patient, respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the revision rate between arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis. Risk factors for revision surgery included male sex for open biceps tenodesis, while age >45 years and rotator cuff tears were protective factors for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis.

[1]  K. Beitzel,et al.  Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in patients over 65 does not result in an increased rate of complications , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[2]  Shiyi Chen,et al.  A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions , 2017, PloS one.

[3]  J. Bravman,et al.  Comparison of Clinical Failure Rates After 2 Techniques of Subpectoral Mini-Open Biceps Tenodesis: Sequence and Suture Passage Technique Matter , 2017, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[4]  David M. Sedory,et al.  Low incidence of failure after proximal biceps tenodesis with unicortical suture button. , 2017, Journal of orthopaedics.

[5]  Samuel A. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis on Reoperation Rates After Rotator Cuff Repair: A Review of a Large Private-Payer Database From 2007 to 2014. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  S. Snyder,et al.  All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  R. Bicknell,et al.  Outcomes following long head of biceps tendon tenodesis , 2016, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[8]  V. P. Kumar,et al.  Systematic Review of Biceps Tenodesis: Arthroscopic Versus Open. , 2016, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[9]  M. Virk,et al.  Complications of Proximal Biceps Tenotomy and Tenodesis. , 2016, Clinics in sports medicine.

[10]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Demographic trends in arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis across the United States. , 2015, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  S. Brockmeier,et al.  Trends in Long Head Biceps Tenodesis , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  S. Burkhart,et al.  Arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis at the articular margin: evaluation of outcomes, complications, and revision rate. , 2015, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  N. Simunovic,et al.  Surgical indications for long head biceps tenodesis: a systematic review , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Biceps tenodesis is a viable option for salvage of failed SLAP repair. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  Mark D. Miller,et al.  Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis: A Comparison of Minimum Two Year Clinical Outcomes , 2014, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  J. Yoo,et al.  Clinical and radiologic results of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with suture anchor in the setting of rotator cuff tear. , 2014, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  M. Provencher,et al.  The Efficacy of Biceps Tenodesis in the Treatment of Failed Superior Labral Anterior Posterior Repairs , 2014, The American journal of sports medicine.

[19]  Steven B Cohen,et al.  Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[20]  J. Warner,et al.  Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament. , 2012, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  Stefanie N. Reiff,et al.  Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery. , 2010, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  R. Arciero,et al.  Clinical Outcomes after Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis with an Interference Screw , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  P Boileau,et al.  The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.