Comparison of Roll and Pitch Among Patients with Vertical and Horizontal Skeletal Patterns Using Cant-O-Meter: A New Gyroscopic Device for Measuring Occlusal Cant

In Orthodontics, initial classification of malocclusions was based on planar malocclusions in the anteroposterior, transverse and vertical planes that were based only on translation of the jaws in space. In 2007, Ackermann and Proffit introduced rotational components—roll, pitch, and yaw—analogous to the position of the airplane in space. These rotations can result in canting of the occlusal plane. There are no quantitative methods available in the literature for a precise estimation of the occlusal cant. Qualitative evaluation of occlusal cant is subjective and is associated with inter-individual variations. This article describes an indigenously devised simple chairside device that can quantify cant of the occlusal plane in terms of the roll and pitch in degrees. There is accurate quantification of cant, which can be used effectively in many clinical scenarios.

[1]  Parvinder Singh Dhingra,et al.  A study of comparison and correlation between antegonial notch depth, symphysis morphology, and ramus morphology among different growth patterns in angle's Class II Division 1 Malocclusion , 2018 .

[2]  J. L. Ackerman,et al.  Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  H. Kiyak,et al.  Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[4]  Raymond Donald Karka,et al.  A Cephalometric Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Growth Trends, Relating Dental and Certain Anatomical Structures, in Manibular Centric and Rest Positions, of Angle Class I, II, and III Malocclusions , 1970 .

[5]  J. L. Ackerman,et al.  The characteristics o f malocclusion: A modern approach to classification and diagnosis , 1969 .

[6]  A. Björk,et al.  Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.

[7]  J. L. Ackerman,et al.  The characteristics of malocclusion: a modern approach to classification and diagnosis. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.

[8]  R. Ricketts Variations of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. , 1950, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  F. Peter [The classification of malocclusion]. , 1949, Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Stomatologie.