Comparison of Roll and Pitch Among Patients with Vertical and Horizontal Skeletal Patterns Using Cant-O-Meter: A New Gyroscopic Device for Measuring Occlusal Cant
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Parvinder Singh Dhingra,et al. A study of comparison and correlation between antegonial notch depth, symphysis morphology, and ramus morphology among different growth patterns in angle's Class II Division 1 Malocclusion , 2018 .
[2] J. L. Ackerman,et al. Pitch, roll, and yaw: describing the spatial orientation of dentofacial traits. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.
[3] H. Kiyak,et al. Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.
[4] Raymond Donald Karka,et al. A Cephalometric Comparison of Vertical and Horizontal Growth Trends, Relating Dental and Certain Anatomical Structures, in Manibular Centric and Rest Positions, of Angle Class I, II, and III Malocclusions , 1970 .
[5] J. L. Ackerman,et al. The characteristics o f malocclusion: A modern approach to classification and diagnosis , 1969 .
[6] A. Björk,et al. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.
[7] J. L. Ackerman,et al. The characteristics of malocclusion: a modern approach to classification and diagnosis. , 1969, American journal of orthodontics.
[8] R. Ricketts. Variations of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. , 1950, American journal of orthodontics.
[9] F. Peter. [The classification of malocclusion]. , 1949, Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Stomatologie.