Stumbling in Their Shoes

Simulating other people’s difficulties often improves attitudes toward those people. In the case of physical disabilities, however, such experience simulations can backfire. By highlighting the initial challenges of becoming disabled, experience simulations decrease the perceived adaptability of being disabled and reduce the judged capabilities of disabled people. In two experiments, participants engaged in a challenging blindness simulation and afterward judged blind people as less capable of work and independent living than did participants after simulating a different impairment (Experiment 1), no impairment (Experiments 1 and 2), or after merely watching someone else simulate blindness (Experiment 2). Blindness simulators forecast that they would be less capable themselves if blind and that they would adapt to blindness more slowly (Experiment 2), highlighting the self-centered nature of judged capabilities of disabled people. The findings demonstrate that experience simulation can sometimes harm rather than help attitudes toward other people’s difficulties.

[1]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Empathy Gaps in Emotional Perspective Taking , 2005 .

[2]  S. Robinson,et al.  Effect of the “Half-Full Aging Simulation Experience” on Medical Students' Attitudes , 2001 .

[3]  F. C. Wilson,et al.  Effectiveness of neurodisability simulation training for NHS staff working in brain injury rehabilitation , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Why the brain talks to itself: sources of error in emotional prediction , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  More Than Skin Deep , 2012, Psychological science.

[6]  H. Brown,et al.  Validity of Euroqol--a generic health status instrument--in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Economic and Health Outcomes Research Group. , 1994, British journal of rheumatology.

[7]  E. Igou Lay theories in affective forecasting: The progression of affect , 2004 .

[8]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  Evaluating Eve: visceral states influence the evaluation of impulsive behavior. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  T. Gilovich,et al.  The illusion of transparency: biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Changing Places: A Dual Judgment Model of Empathy Gaps in Emotional Perspective Taking , 2013 .

[12]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches , 1981 .

[13]  E. Igou "How long will I suffer?" versus "How long will you suffer?" A self-other effect in affective forecasting. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. Kirylo,et al.  The Dyslexia Simulation: Impact and Implications , 2008 .

[15]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  G. Clore,et al.  Emotional role playing, attitude change, and attraction toward a disabled person. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Beatrice A. Wright,et al.  Physical disability - a psychosocial approach, 2nd ed. , 1983 .

[18]  N. Boyd,et al.  Whose Utilities for Decision Analysis? , 1990, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[19]  S. French,et al.  Simulation Exercises in Disability Awareness Training: A Critique , 1992 .

[20]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. , 1995 .

[21]  Lori A. Lattarulo Disability, Society, and the Individual , 2001 .

[22]  G. Cumming The New Statistics: Why and How , 2013 .

[23]  Intended and unintended consequences of internal motivation to behave nonprejudiced: The case of benevolent discrimination† , 2009 .

[24]  J. Baron,et al.  Ignorance of hedonic adaptation to hemodialysis: a study using ecological momentary assessment. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  B. A. Wright The coping framework and attitude change: A guide to constructive role-playing. , 1978 .

[26]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Disability and sunshine: can hedonic predictions be improved by drawing attention to focusing illusions or emotional adaptation? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[28]  Matthew K. Burns,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Disability Simulation Research , 2007 .

[29]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The Future Is Now: Temporal Correction in Affective Forecasting☆ , 2002 .

[30]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: A 30-Year Perspective: , 1994 .

[31]  G. Torrance,et al.  The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.

[32]  W. Mcguire The Yin and Yang of Progress in Social Psychology: Seven Koan. , 1973 .

[33]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility , 2000 .