A Multidisciplinary Performance Analysis of a Lifting-Body Single-Stage-to-Orbit Vehicle

Lockheed Martin Skunk Works (LMSW) is currently developing a single-stage-to-orbit reusable launch vehi- cle called VentureStar™. A team at NASA Langley Re- search Center participated with LMSW in the screening and evaluation of a number of early VentureStar™ con- figurations. The performance analyses that supported these initial studies were conducted to assess the effect of a lifting body shape, linear aerospike engine and me- tallic thermal protection system (TPS) on the weight and performance of the vehicle. These performance studies were performed in a multidisciplinary fashion that indi- rectly linked the trajectory optimization with weight es- timation and aerothermal analysis tools. This approach was necessary to develop optimized ascent and entry tra- jectories that met all vehicle design constraints. Significant improvements in ascent performance were achieved when the vehicle flew a lifting trajectory and varied the engine mixture ratio during flight. Also, a considerable reduction in empty weight was possible by adjusting the total oxidizer-to-fuel and liftoff thrust-to- weight ratios. However, the optimal ascent flight profile had to be altered to ensure that the vehicle could be trimmed in pitch using only the flow diverting capability of the aerospike engine. Likewise, the optimal entry tra- jectory had to be tailored to meet TPS heating rate and transition constraints while satisfying a crossrange re- quirement.

[1]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Application of dual-fuel propulsion to a single stage AMLS vehicle , 1993 .

[2]  M. K. Lockwood,et al.  Overview of Conceptual Design of Early VentureStar(TM) Configurations , 2000 .

[3]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Rocket-powered single-stage vehicle configuration selection and design , 1993 .

[4]  Dean R Chapman,et al.  An approximate analytical method for studying entry into planetary atmospheres , 1958 .

[5]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Computational/Experimental Aeroheating Predictions for X-33. Phase 2; Vehicle , 1998 .

[6]  Kathryn E. Wurster,et al.  Engineering Aerothermal Analysis for X-34 Thermal Protection System Design , 1999 .

[7]  Robert Baumgartner,et al.  Lifting body - An innovative RLV concept , 1995 .

[8]  Kathryn E. Wurster,et al.  Technology and Operational Considerations for Low-Heat-Rate Entry Trajectories , 1980 .

[9]  G. L. Brauer,et al.  Capabilities and applications of the Program to Optimize Simulated Trajectories (POST). Program summary document , 1977 .

[10]  K. E. Wurster An assessment of the impact of transition on advanced winged entry vehicle thermal protection system mass , 1981 .

[11]  Fred DeJarnette,et al.  Approximate method for calculating heating rates on three-dimensional vehicles , 1994 .

[12]  J. H. Thomas,et al.  Hypersonic Boundary Layer Transition for the X-33 Phase II Vehicle , 1998 .

[13]  J J Korte,et al.  Parametric Model of an Aerospike Rocket Engine , 2000 .

[14]  S. C. Praharaj,et al.  MINIVER upgrade for the AVID system. Volume 1: LANMIN user's manual , 1983 .

[15]  C. H. Eldred,et al.  Technology and operational considerations for low-heat-rate trajectories of future winged earth reentry vehicles , 1979 .

[16]  Douglas O. Stanley,et al.  Propulsion system requirements for reusable single-stage-to-orbit rocket vehicles , 1992 .

[17]  H. W. Stone,et al.  Aerodynamic heating environment definition/thermal protection system selection for the HL-20 , 1993 .