Who will dominate the global fossil fuel trade?

[1]  N. Keilman.  Modelling education and climate change , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[2]  Francesco Laio,et al.  Tools for reconstructing the bilateral trade network: a critical assessment , 2019, Economic Systems Research.

[3]  L. Ridolfi,et al.  National water, food, and trade modeling framework: The case of Egypt , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Andrea Fracasso,et al.  The evolution of oil trade: A complex network approach , 2018, Network Science.

[5]  R. Duarte,et al.  Factors driving embodied carbon in international trade: a multiregional input–output gravity model , 2018 .

[6]  Huajiao Li,et al.  Who will build new trade relations? Finding potential relations in international liquefied natural gas trade , 2017 .

[7]  Luca Ridolfi,et al.  To trade or not to trade: Link prediction in the virtual water network , 2017 .

[8]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Modeling the future evolution of the virtual water trade network: A combination of network and gravity models , 2017 .

[9]  P. Gilbert,et al.  Global energy scenarios and their implications for future shipped trade , 2017 .

[10]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[11]  M. Strubegger,et al.  The marker quantification of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathway 2: A middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[12]  M. Kainuma,et al.  SSP3: AIM implementation of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[13]  P. Kyle,et al.  The SSP4: A world of deepening inequality , 2017 .

[14]  Jesus Crespo Cuaresma,et al.  Income projections for climate change research: A framework based on human capital dynamics , 2017 .

[15]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[16]  M. Strubegger,et al.  Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives , 2017 .

[17]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[18]  C. Müller,et al.  Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm , 2017 .

[19]  K. Calvin,et al.  Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century , 2017 .

[20]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  To RAS or not to RAS? What is the difference in outcomes in multi-regional input–output models? , 2016 .

[21]  Mei Sun,et al.  Features and evolution of international fossil energy trade relationships: A weighted multilayer network analysis , 2015 .

[22]  Liz Varga,et al.  Energy and complexity: New ways forward , 2015 .

[23]  Philipp M. Richter,et al.  A Global Perspective on the Future of Natural Gas: Resources, Trade, and Climate Constraints , 2015, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[24]  Ying Fan,et al.  A Dynamic Analysis on Global Natural Gas Trade Network , 2014 .

[25]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Assessment of energy security in China based on ecological network analysis: A perspective from the security of crude oil supply , 2014 .

[26]  Haizhong An,et al.  The evolution of communities in the international oil trade network , 2014 .

[27]  Ying Fan,et al.  Competition, Transmission and Pattern Evolution: A Network Analysis of Global Oil Trade , 2014 .

[28]  Huajiao Li,et al.  Features and evolution of international crude oil trade relationships: A trading-based network analysis , 2014 .

[29]  Ying Fan,et al.  Identification of Global Oil Trade Patterns: An Empirical Research Based on Complex Network Theory , 2014 .

[30]  Lixin Tian,et al.  Research on the evolution model of an energy supply–demand network , 2012 .

[31]  Geoffrey J. D. Hewings,et al.  INTER-REGIONAL TRADE FLOW ESTIMATION THROUGH NON-SURVEY MODELS: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT , 2012 .

[32]  Guoqian Chen,et al.  An overview of energy consumption of the globalized world economy , 2011 .

[33]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The future of U.S. natural gas production, use, and trade , 2011 .

[34]  Il Moon,et al.  Current status and future projections of LNG demand and supplies: A global prospective , 2011 .

[35]  Lorenzo Caliendo,et al.  Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA , 2011 .

[36]  Roberto Mínguez,et al.  Cell-Corrected Ras Method (CRAS) for Updating or Regionalizing an Input–Output Matrix , 2009 .

[37]  Rakhal Sarker,et al.  Regional trade agreements and trade in agri‐food products: evidence for the European Union from gravity modeling using disaggregated data , 2007 .

[38]  P. Río,et al.  Projection of input–output tables by means of mathematical programming based on the hypothesis of stable structural evolution , 2005 .

[39]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Alternative Input-Output Matrix Updating Formulations , 2004 .

[40]  Louis de Mesnard,et al.  Biproportional Techniques in Input-Output Analysis: Table Updating and Structural Analysis , 2004 .

[41]  M. Toh,et al.  The RAS Approach in Updating Input–Output Matrices: An Instrumental Variable Interpretation and Analysis of Structural Change , 1998 .

[42]  L.W. Zelby,et al.  Guidelines for the development of a consistent long-range energy policy , 1990, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[43]  M. Stein.  Large sample properties of simulations using latin hypercube sampling , 1987 .

[44]  J. Bergstrand.  The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence , 1985 .

[45]  Ashok Parikh,et al.  Forecasts of Input-Output Matrices Using the R.A.S. Method , 1979 .