Antigen detection and immunological typing of Haemophilus ducreyi with a specific rabbit polyclonal serum

A rabbit polyclonal serum was raised against the 29-kDa species-specific marker, as well as the 30- to 34-kDa immunotype-specific markers of Haemophilus ducreyi described elsewhere (E. Roggen, S. De Breucker, E. Van Dyck, and P. Piot, Infect. Immun. 60:590-595, 1992). These antigens were purified from a cocktail of H. ducreyi isolates by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The immune serum reacted in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) preferentially with H. ducreyi, at a titer as high as 50,000. To make it specific to H. ducreyi, nonspecific antibodies were removed by adsorption on a mixture of Haemophilus spp., Escherichia coli, Candida albicans, and Corynebacterium spp. In the 29- to 34-kDa region of immunoblot profiles from H. ducreyi isolates (n = 450), the adsorbed serum revealed essentially the same antigens as did a pool of well-characterized human sera. Yet, eight different immunotypes were observed. With this rabbit polyclonal serum, an ELISA-based antigen detection test was developed. The adsorbed serum reacted specifically with all H. ducreyi isolates tested (n = 450), but not with other bacterial species (n = 15). This test was evaluated with a limited number of clinical specimens from African patients with culture-proven chancroid and no evidence for any other ulcerating etiology (n = 10) and a number of chancroid-negative control patients from Belgium (n = 20). Within this context, the test yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 100%.

[1]  P. Piot,et al.  Antigenic diversity in Haemophilus ducreyi as shown by western blot (immunoblot) analysis , 1992, Infection and immunity.

[2]  P. Perine,et al.  Genital ulcers and male circumcision as risk factors for acquiring HIV-1 in Zambia. , 1990, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[3]  D. Dance,et al.  Rapid detection of Haemophilus ducreyi in clinical and experimental infections using monoclonal antibody: a preliminary evaluation. , 1989, Genitourinary medicine.

[4]  H. Handsfield,et al.  The association between genital ulcer disease and acquisition of HIV infection in homosexual men. , 1988, JAMA.

[5]  P. Piot,et al.  Use of an enzyme immunoassay to detect serum IgG antibodies to Haemophilus ducreyi. , 1988, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[6]  P. Piot,et al.  Retrospective seroepidemiology of AIDS virus infection in Nairobi populations. , 1987, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[7]  H. Zanen,et al.  Clinical and microbiological evaluation of 46 episodes of genital ulceration. , 1987, Genitourinary medicine.

[8]  G. Schmid,et al.  Use of dot-immunobinding and immunofluorescence assays to investigate clinically suspected cases of chancroid. , 1986, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  D. Taylor-Robinson.  Clinical Problems in Sexually Transmitted Diseases , 2012, New Perspectives in Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  P. Piot,et al.  Typing Haemophilus ducreyi by indirect immunofluorescence assay. , 1985, Genitourinary medicine.

[11]  D. N. Taylor,et al.  The Role of Haemophilus ducreyi in Penile Ulcers in Bangkok, Thailand , 1984, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[12]  P. Piot,et al.  Comparison of Media for the Primary Isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi , 1984, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[13]  R. Bhatia,et al.  Bacteriological study of chancroid. , 1982, The Indian journal of medical research.

[14]  T. Chapel,et al.  An indirect fluorescent antibody technique for Haemophilus ducreyi. , 1978, Health laboratory science.

[15]  M. M. Bradford.  A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[16]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.