Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.

The preparation of multiple element movements has been examined for decades, with no clear explanation offered for the disparate results observed. Results from 2 experiments are presented and, in conjunction with previous results, a theoretical interpretation is offered regarding the preparatory processes that occur before, during and after the reaction time (RT) interval for multiple element movements during both simple and choice RT paradigms. In Experiment 1, number of elements and timing complexity were manipulated in a simple RT key-press task, using a startling acoustic stimulus to probe advance preparation. Both startle and nonstartle RT increased with number of movement elements and for a movement with increased timing complexity, providing evidence that the control of response timing occurs during the RT interval. In Experiment 2, the production of key-press movements of varying number of elements was compared in a simple versus choice RT paradigm. Results indicated that simple RT was affected by the number of elements, yet choice RT was not. Additionally, choice RT trials showed significantly longer interresponse intervals compared with those observed in simple RT trials, providing evidence for online processing in choice RT. The results of both studies, together with previous findings, suggest that planning of the timing of the onsets of the elements is prepared during simple RT, whereas planning of other aspects of the sequence of elements seems to occur in the foreperiod prior to the "go" signal. Conversely, in the choice RT paradigm, timing seems to be controlled online. This explanation may bring closure on difficulties encountered in over 50 years of research examining response preparation for complex movements.

[1]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The startle reflex, voluntary movement, and the reticulospinal tract. , 2006, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  N. Hodges,et al.  Motor preparation and the effects of practice: evidence from startle. , 2011, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  L. E. Ribeiro-do-Valle,et al.  Influence of cueing on the preparation and execution of untrained and trained complex motor responses , 2012, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[4]  Claire F. Honeycutt,et al.  Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  I. Franks,et al.  The effects of demanding temporal accuracy on the programming of simple tapping sequences , 1990 .

[6]  Michael J. Carter,et al.  Startle neural activity is additive with normal cortical initiation-related activation , 2014, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Preparation for voluntary movement in healthy and clinical populations: Evidence from startle , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Considerations for the use of a startling acoustic stimulus in studies of motor preparation in humans , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  Dana Maslovat,et al.  Response preparation changes during practice of an asynchronous bimanual movement , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[11]  D. Kourtis,et al.  EEG correlates of Fitts’s law during preparation for action , 2012, Psychological research.

[12]  Stuart T Klapp,et al.  Reaction Time Analysis of Two Types of Motor Preparation for Speech Articulation: Action as a Sequence of Chunks , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  K. Lashley The problem of serial order in behavior , 1951 .

[14]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The effects of target discriminability and retinal eccentricity on saccade latencies: An analysis in terms of variable-criterion theory , 1990, Psychological research.

[16]  J. Valls-Solé,et al.  Interaction between startle and voluntary reactions in humans , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Richard J Jagacinski,et al.  Gestalt principles in the control of motor action. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered , 1973 .

[19]  I. Franks,et al.  The preparation and initiation of simple rhythmical patterns , 1991 .

[20]  Juan M. Castellote,et al.  Excitability of subcortical motor circuits in Go/noGo and forced choice reaction time tasks , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. , 1995 .

[23]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[24]  Anthony N. Carlsen,et al.  Can prepared responses be stored subcortically? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Stuart T Klapp,et al.  Comments on the classic Henry And Rogers (1960) paper on its 50th anniversary: resolving the issue of simple versus choice reaction time. , 2010, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[26]  Frank N. Freeman,et al.  Preliminary experiments on writing and reactions. , 2022 .

[27]  F. M. Henry,et al.  Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor Reaction , 1960 .

[28]  David L Wright,et al.  Motor Programming When Sequencing Multiple Elements of the Same Duration , 2008, Journal of motor behavior.

[29]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .