A comparison of commercial ethanol production systems from Brazilian sugarcane and US corn

Global biofuels production grew rapidly from 2007 to 2012, led by the United States and Brazil, the world's two largest fuel-ethanol-producing systems. In this paper we provide insights into the characteristics of mature Brazilian sugarcane and maturing US dry mill corn ethanol industries. Both systems continue to improve as measured by life cycle data such as total renewable energy produced per unit of fossil energy consumed [renewable energy ratio (RER)]. Sugarcane self-benchmarking systems showed RER values of 7.0 in 2002 to 9.4 in 2009 as the industry started to switch to mechanized harvesting. The average US RER improved from 1.1 to 1.7 from 2000 to 2010. RERs of 4.4 to 5.5 are observed in corn ethanol plants employing natural gas or corn stover combined heat and power. Ethanol systems configured to produce ethanol and electricity had similar net energy balances (a ratio of net energy produced to energy contained in the fuel). One measure of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions (biomass use efficiency) compares the effectiveness of displacing carbon from combustion of fossil fuels with renewable carbon. Advanced corn ethanol systems reach higher GHG emission reduction levels compared to sugarcane ethanol by displacing coal-based electricity. Sugarcane systems achieve double the GHG emissions reductions per unit of harvested land relative to corn ethanol because sugarcane and corn are grown as perennial and annual crops in tropical and temperate climatic zones, respectively. Carbon dioxide capture and storage systems could offer additional GHG emission reductions for both corn and sugarcane ethanol systems. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

[1]  David D. Hsu,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of selected U.S. ethanol production and use pathways in 2022. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  M. Brander,et al.  The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[3]  Yi-Wen Chiu,et al.  Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Joaquim E. A. Seabra,et al.  Comparative analysis for power generation and ethanol production from sugarcane residual biomass in Brazil , 2011 .

[5]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Reconciling top-down and bottom-up modelling on future bioenergy deployment , 2012 .

[6]  Joaquim E. A. Seabra,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use , 2011 .

[7]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  The water footprint of bioenergy , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Adam M. Boies,et al.  Implications of local lifecycle analyses and low carbon fuel standard design on gasohol transportation fuels , 2011 .

[9]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Energy and greenhouse gas emission effects of corn and cellulosic ethanol with technology improvements and land use changes , 2011 .

[10]  H. Cai,et al.  Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use , 2012 .

[11]  Nicolae Scarlat,et al.  Recent developments of biofuels/bioenergy sustainability certification: A global overview , 2011 .

[12]  Rebecca A. Efroymson,et al.  The land use–climate change–energy nexus , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  Fabíola Cristina de Oliveira.  Ocupação, emprego e remuneração na cana-de-açúcar e em outras atividades agropecuárias no Brasil, de 1992 a 2007 , 2009 .

[14]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage—Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions , 2003 .

[15]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[16]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  R. Vance Morey,et al.  Reducing life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol by integrating biomass to produce heat and power at ethanol plants , 2007 .

[18]  Kimberley A Mullins,et al.  Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Replacing gasoline with corn ethanol results in significant environmental problem-shifting. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Semida Silveira,et al.  Accounting greenhouse gas emissions in the lifecycle of Brazilian sugarcane bioethanol: Methodological references in European and American regulations , 2012 .

[21]  Thiago Oliveira Rodrigues,et al.  Sustainability of the Biorefinery Industry for Fuel Production , 2013 .

[22]  S. Polasky,et al.  Assessing the comparative productivity advantage of bioenergy feedstocks at different latitudes , 2012 .

[23]  Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos.  Bioetanol de cana-de-açúcar: energia para o desenvolvimento sustentável , 2008 .

[24]  Matthew J. De Kam,et al.  Integrating Biomass to Produce Heat and Power at Ethanol Plants , 2009 .

[25]  Matthew J. De Kam,et al.  Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle for heat and power at ethanol plants. , 2009 .

[26]  J. Seabra,et al.  Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. , 2008 .

[27]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Explaining the experience curve: Cost reductions of Brazilian ethanol from sugarcane , 2009 .

[28]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil , 2009 .

[29]  Michael O'Hare,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels' indirect land use change are uncertain but may be much greater than previously estimated. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  Andrew J. McAloon,et al.  Understanding the reductions in US corn ethanol production costs: an experience curve approach , 2009 .

[31]  A. Faaij,et al.  From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning , 2010 .