A second-order Cartesian method for the simulation of electropermeabilization cell models

In this paper, we present a new finite differences method to simulate electropermeabilization models, like the model of Neu and Krassowska or the recent model of Kavian et al. These models are based on the evolution of the electric potential in a cell embedded in a conducting medium. The main feature lies in the transmission of the voltage potential across the cell membrane: the jump of the potential is proportional to the normal flux thanks to the well-known Kirchoff law. An adapted scheme is thus necessary to accurately simulate the voltage potential in the whole cell, notably at the membrane separating the cell from the outer medium. We present a second-order finite differences scheme in the spirit of the method introduced by Cisternino and Weynans for elliptic problems with immersed interfaces. This is a Cartesian grid method based on the accurate discretization of the fluxes at the interface, through the use of additional interface unknowns. The main novelty of our present work lies in the fact that the jump of the potential is proportional to the flux, and therefore is not explicitly known. The original use of interface unknowns makes it possible to discretize the transmission conditions with enough accuracy to obtain a second-order spatial convergence. We prove the second-order spatial convergence in the stationary linear one-dimensional case, and the first-order temporal convergence for the dynamical non-linear model in one dimension. We then perform numerical experiments in two dimensions that corroborate these results.

[1]  Anne Greenbaum,et al.  Fast Parallel Iterative Solution of Poisson's and the Biharmonic Equations on Irregular Regions , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[2]  Wanda Krassowska,et al.  Asymptotic model of electroporation , 1999 .

[3]  Thierry Colin,et al.  A second order Cartesian finite volume method for elliptic interface and embedded Dirichlet problems , 2013 .

[4]  J. Sethian Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts , 2001 .

[5]  Anita Mayo,et al.  The rapid evaluation of volume integrals of potential theory on general regions , 1992 .

[6]  Zhilin Li A Fast Iterative Algorithm for Elliptic Interface Problems , 1998 .

[7]  S. Osher,et al.  A Non-oscillatory Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (the Ghost Fluid Method) , 1999 .

[8]  M. Cisternino,et al.  A Parallel Second Order Cartesian Method for Elliptic Interface Problems , 2012 .

[9]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[10]  R. Fedkiw,et al.  A Boundary Condition Capturing Method for Poisson's Equation on Irregular Domains , 2000 .

[11]  Clair Poignard,et al.  “Classical” Electropermeabilization Modeling at the Cell Scale , 2014, Journal of mathematical biology.

[12]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Level set methods and dynamic implicit surfaces , 2002, Applied mathematical sciences.

[13]  J. Thomas Beale,et al.  ON THE ACCURACY OF FINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS FOR ELLIPTIC PROBLEMS WITH INTERFACES , 2006 .

[14]  Giovanni Russo,et al.  Finite-difference ghost-point multigrid methods on Cartesian grids for elliptic problems in arbitrary domains , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  Kazufumi Ito,et al.  Maximum Principle Preserving Schemes for Interface Problems with Discontinuous Coefficients , 2001, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[16]  Li-Tien Cheng,et al.  A second-order-accurate symmetric discretization of the Poisson equation on irregular domains , 2002 .

[17]  James A. Sethian,et al.  Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods , 1999 .

[18]  I-Liang Chern,et al.  A coupling interface method for elliptic interface problems , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[20]  Zhilin Li,et al.  Convergence analysis of the immersed interface method , 1999 .

[21]  Shan Zhao,et al.  High order matched interface and boundary method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[22]  A. Mayo The Fast Solution of Poisson’s and the Biharmonic Equations on Irregular Regions , 1984 .

[23]  Petter Andreas Berthelsen,et al.  A decomposed immersed interface method for variable coefficient elliptic equations with non-smooth and discontinuous solutions , 2004 .

[24]  Chang-Ock Lee,et al.  A discontinuous Galerkin method for elliptic interface problems with application to electroporation , 2009 .

[25]  R. LeVeque,et al.  A comparison of the extended finite element method with the immersed interface method for elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients and singular sources , 2006 .

[26]  Andreas Wiegmann,et al.  The Explicit-Jump Immersed Interface Method: Finite Difference Methods for PDEs with Piecewise Smooth Solutions , 2000, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[27]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects Of field strength and rest potential. , 1999, Biophysical journal.