Sensitivity of Hydrocarbon Combustion Modeling for Hypersonic Missile Design

Aspects relating to the aerodynamic and propulsive design and analysis of missile-class, waverider-based hypersonic vehicles are explored in this paper. A quasi-one-dimensional engine model, including the effects of fuel injection, mixing, chemical production rates, heat transfer, and viscous losses, is developed and utilized to assess the effects of finite rate, hydrocarbon chemistry on optimized missile configurations. Resultant optimized single-and double-engine missile designs are shown for changes in fuel mixing length, fuel mixing efficiency, fuel-injector location, and assumed fuel mass fraction. The effects of these different design conditions on the cruise range are explored, as well as perturbations around these design points for optimized vehicles. Missiles are optimized for steady-state trim conditions at the beginning of cruise flight using parallelized genetic algorithm optimization software developed for this study. All missile designs are assumed to reach cruising altitude and velocity through the use of an external rocket booster. The missile is geometrically constrained to fit within the 0.61 x 0.61 × 4.27 m box limits for a naval vertical launch tube and has a desired cruise range of 750 km at Mach 8. Results show that the optimized combustor designs were extremely sensitive to small design perturbations. Two engine configurations are shown to be more robust than single-engine models for engine design perturbations.

[1]  P. J. Waltrup,et al.  History of U.S. Navy Ramjet, Scramjet, and Mixed-Cycle Propulsion Development , 1996 .

[2]  H. Sobieczky,et al.  Interactive Design of Hypersonic Waverider Geometries , 1991 .

[3]  S. Turns Introduction to Combustion , 1995, Aerothermodynamics and Jet Propulsion.

[4]  Song-Lin Yang,et al.  Reduced reaction mechanisms for numerical calculations in combustion of hydrocarbon fuels , 1998 .

[5]  Mark J. Lewis,et al.  Navier-Stokes computation of a viscous optimized waverider , 1994 .

[6]  Michael Joseph Gillum,et al.  Experimental Results on a Mach 14 Waverider with Blunt Leading Edges , 1997 .

[7]  R. J. Kee,et al.  Chemkin-II : A Fortran Chemical Kinetics Package for the Analysis of Gas Phase Chemical Kinetics , 1991 .

[8]  F. S. Billig,et al.  Heat transfer in supersonic combustion processes , 1970 .

[9]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Simple analytical model for parametric studies of hypersonic waveriders , 1999 .

[10]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[11]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Critical Design Issues for Airbreathing Hypersonic Waverider Missiles , 2001 .

[12]  Ryan P. Starkey Investigation of air-breathing, hypersonic missile configurations within external box constraints , 2000 .

[13]  J. Anderson,et al.  Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics , 2019 .

[14]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  The Air Pressure on a Cone Moving at High Speeds. II , 1933 .

[15]  Mark J. Lewis,et al.  Development of a Jet-A/Silane/Hydrogen Reaction Mechanism for Modeling a , 1999 .

[16]  Jack Dongarra,et al.  PVM: Parallel virtual machine: a users' guide and tutorial for networked parallel computing , 1995 .

[17]  D. Capriotti,et al.  Viscous optimized hypersonic waveriders , 1987 .

[18]  NARUHISA TAKASHIMA,et al.  Navier-Stokes computations of a viscous optimized waverider , 1992 .

[19]  G. Y. Anderson,et al.  Exploratory tests of two strut fuel injectors for supersonic combustion , 1974 .

[20]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .

[21]  Mark J. Lewis,et al.  Joint Jet-A/Silane/Hydrogen Reaction Mechanism , 2000 .

[22]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Quasi-One-Dimensional High-Speed Engine Model with Finite-Rate Chemistry , 2001 .

[23]  T. R. F. Nonweiler,et al.  Aerodynamic Problems of Manned Space Vehicles , 1959, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.