The competition box: a graphical aid to forecasting pollinator performance

1. Three major determinants of bees' nectar-foraging patterns are the maximum depth at which nectar is accessible (dependent on bee tongue length) ; the minimum profitable energy content per flower (dependent on foraging costs and hence on bee body mass) ; and the minimum threshold temperature for flight. These form the axes of a three-dimensional template, the competition box. 2. Thresholds of depth, cost and temperature can be identified for each species of bee, delimiting domains within the box compatible with foraging by each bee species. 3. Changes through a day in temperature and in the depth and sugar content of nectar define the nectar trajectory through the box for a flower species in relation to microclimate and bee activity. 4. This approach allows systematic appraisal of the roles of accessibility, energy content and temperature in interspecific competition among bees for nectar, and draws attention to situations in which additional factors may be important. 5. By superimposing a bee-species-specific template on a representative nectar trajectory for a given flower species in a given situation, it is possible to make reasoned guesses about the expected interactions of foraging bee species with a novel flower species and with each other in a novel situation. Such guesses are required for evaluating the expected impact of honey-bees and other introduced pollinators on the pollination system of crops and natural vegetation. 6. Use of the competition box is illustrated in relation to dawn-to-dusk studies involving measurements of nectar concentration and volume, microclimate, flower form, and the tongue lengths and foraging activity of bees of different species.

[1]  K. E. Machin,et al.  Oxygen consumption of bumblebees in forward flight , 1990, Nature.

[2]  Weights of Worker Honeybees in Swarms , 1982 .

[3]  Robert D. Stevenson,et al.  Physiological Correlates of Foraging Efforts in Honey-Bees: Oxygen Consumption and Nectar Load , 1989 .

[4]  O. Prŷs-Jones Foraging behaviour and the activity of substrate cycle enzymes in bumblebees , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  A. D. Brian DIFFERENCES IN THE FLOWERS VISITED BY FOUR SPECIES OF BUMBLE-BEES AND THEIR CAUSES , 1957 .

[6]  Z. Gliwicz,et al.  Food thresholds and body size in cladocerans , 1990, Nature.

[7]  W. Alpatov Biometrical Studies on Variation and Races of the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera L.) , 1929, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[8]  S. N. Holm The Utilization and Management of Bumble Bees for Red Clover and Alfalfa Seed Production , 1966 .

[9]  J. Silvola Respiration and energetics of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris queen , 1984 .

[10]  J. Osborne,et al.  Beekeeping, Wild Bees and Pollination in the European Community , 1991 .

[11]  D. Inouye The Terminology of Floral Larceny , 1980 .

[12]  D. Inouye Resource Partitioning in Bumblebees: Experimental Studies of Foraging Behavior , 1978 .

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  The Distribution and Abundance of Resources Encountered by a Forager , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[14]  G. Pyke Optimal foraging in bumblebees: calculation of net rate of energy intake and optimal patch choice. , 1980, Theoretical population biology.

[15]  L. Harder Flower handling efficiency of bumble bees: morphological aspects of probing time , 1983, Oecologia.

[16]  J. Louveaux,et al.  BIOMETRICAL-STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GEOGRAPHIC VARIABILITY OF APIS MELLIFERA L. I. Material and Methods , 1978 .

[17]  W. Hadfield,et al.  Effectiveness of honey bees and bumble bees in the pollination of Montgomery red clover , 1958 .

[18]  B. Heinrich Resource Partitioning Among Some Eusocial Insects: Bumblebees , 1976 .

[19]  W. J. Bean Trees and Shrubs hardy in the British Isles , 1936, Nature.

[20]  S. Corbet,et al.  Flower usage by bumble-bees : a basis for forage plant management , 1992 .

[21]  J. Dugdale The Insects in Relation to Plants , 1975 .

[22]  S. Corbet,et al.  Temperature and the pollinating activity of social bees , 1993 .

[23]  H. Morimoto The Use of the Labial Palpus as a Measure of Proboscis Length in Worker Honeybees Apis Mellifera Ligustica and Apis Cerana Cerana , 1968 .

[24]  A. Pekkarinen Morphometric, colour and enzyme variation in bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus) in Fennoscandia and Denmark , 1979 .

[25]  J. Free Insect pollination of crops , 1970 .

[26]  Wayne C. Houtcooper,et al.  Distribution and Abundance , 1974 .

[27]  S. Corbet,et al.  Cotoneasterfor bumble bees and honey bees , 1992 .

[28]  A. R. Clapham,et al.  Flora of the British Isles , 1962 .

[29]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[30]  L. Harder Measurement and estimation of functional proboscis length in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 1982 .