Comparing 24 h physical activity profiles: Office workers, women with a history of gestational diabetes and people with chronic disease condition(s)

ABSTRACT This study demonstrates a novel data-driven method of summarising accelerometer data to profile physical activity in three diverse groups, compared with cut-point determined moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). GGIR was used to generate average daily acceleration, intensity gradient, time in MVPA and MX metrics (acceleration above which the most active X-minutes accumulate) from wrist-worn accelerometer data from three datasets: office-workers (OW, N = 697), women with a history of post-gestational diabetes (PGD, N = 267) and adults with ≥1 chronic disease (CD, N = 1,325). Average acceleration and MVPA were lower in CD, but not PGD, relative to OW (−5.2 mg and −30.7 minutes, respectively, P < 0.001). Both PGD and CD had poorer intensity distributions than OW (P < 0.001). Application of a cut-point to the M30 showed 7%, 17% and 28%, of OW, PGD and CD, respectively, accumulated 30 minutes of brisk walking per day. Radar plots showed OW had higher overall activity than CD. The relatively poor intensity distribution of PGD, despite similar overall activity to OW, was due to accumulation of more light and less higher intensity activity. These data-driven methods identify aspects of activity that differ between groups, which may be missed by cut-point methods alone. Abbreviations: CD: Adults with ≥1 chronic disease; mg: Milli-gravitational unit; MVPA: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; OW: Office workers; PGD: Women with a history of post-gestational diabetes; VPA: Vigorous physical activity

[1]  Kamlesh Khunti,et al.  Enhancing the value of accelerometer-assessed physical activity: meaningful visual comparisons of data-driven translational accelerometer metrics , 2019, Sports Medicine - Open.

[2]  K. Khunti,et al.  Rationale and design of a cross-sectional study to investigate and describe the chronotype of patients with type 2 diabetes and the effect on glycaemic control: the CODEC study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[3]  Kamlesh Khunti,et al.  Activity Intensity, Volume, and Norms: Utility and Interpretation of Accelerometer Metrics. , 2019, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  K. Khunti,et al.  Providing a Basis for Harmonization of Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity Outcomes Across Epidemiological Datasets , 2019, Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour.

[5]  Alex V. Rowlands,et al.  GGIR: A Research Community–Driven Open Source R Package for Generating Physical Activity and Sleep Outcomes From Multi-Day Raw Accelerometer Data , 2019, Journal for the Measurement of Physical Behaviour.

[6]  R. Taylor,et al.  One size does not fit all-application of accelerometer thresholds in chronic disease. , 2019, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  M. Woodward,et al.  Response to: One size does not fit all-application of accelerometer thresholds in chronic disease. , 2019, International journal of epidemiology.

[8]  M. Woodward,et al.  Physical activity of UK adults with chronic disease: cross sectional analysis of accelerometer measured physical activity in 96 706 UK Biobank participants , 2019, International Journal of Epidemiology.

[9]  Kamlesh Khunti,et al.  A data-driven, meaningful, easy to interpret, standardised accelerometer outcome variable for global surveillance. , 2019, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[10]  K. Khunti,et al.  Physical activity, multimorbidity, and life expectancy: a UK Biobank longitudinal study , 2019, BMC Medicine.

[11]  N. Wareham,et al.  Estimating energy expenditure from wrist and thigh accelerometry in free-living adults: a doubly labelled water study , 2018, bioRxiv.

[12]  Marie Löf,et al.  Comparability of published cut‐points for the assessment of physical activity: Implications for data harmonization , 2018, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[13]  K. Khunti,et al.  Baby Steps – a structured group education programme with accompanying mobile web application designed to promote physical activity in women with a history of gestational diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2018, Trials.

[14]  K. Khunti,et al.  Movement through Active Personalised engagement (MAP) — a self-management programme designed to promote physical activity in people with multimorbidity: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2018, Trials.

[15]  Alex V Rowlands,et al.  Moving Forward With Accelerometer-Assessed Physical Activity: Two Strategies to Ensure Meaningful, Interpretable, and Comparable Measures. , 2018, Pediatric exercise science.

[16]  K. Khunti,et al.  Physical Activity after Cardiac EventS (PACES) – a group education programme with subsequent text-message support designed to increase physical activity in individuals with diagnosed coronary heart disease: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial , 2018, Trials.

[17]  K. Khunti,et al.  Associations of Physical Behaviours and Behavioural Reallocations with Markers of Metabolic Health: A Compositional Data Analysis , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[18]  O. Franco,et al.  Physical activity and cause-specific mortality: the Rotterdam Study. , 2018, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  M. Granat,et al.  A three arm cluster randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SMART Work & Life intervention for reducing daily sitting time in office workers: study protocol , 2018, BMC Public Health.

[20]  W. Haskell,et al.  Accumulation of Moderate‐to‐Vigorous Physical Activity and All‐Cause Mortality , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[21]  KAMLESH KHUNTI,et al.  Beyond Cut Points: Accelerometer Metrics that Capture the Physical Activity Profile , 2018, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  Kamlesh Khunti,et al.  Association of walking pace and handgrip strength with all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality: a UK Biobank observational study , 2017, European heart journal.

[23]  Archana Singh-Manoux,et al.  Accelerometer assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and successful ageing: results from the Whitehall II study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[24]  N. Wareham,et al.  Estimation of Physical Activity Energy Expenditure during Free-Living from Wrist Accelerometry in UK Adults , 2016, PloS one.

[25]  Claire LeBlanc,et al.  Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep. , 2016, Applied physiology, nutrition, and metabolism = Physiologie appliquee, nutrition et metabolisme.

[26]  ALEX V. ROWLANDS,et al.  Raw Accelerometer Data Analysis with GGIR R-package: Does Accelerometer Brand Matter? , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  P. Kearney,et al.  Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  Karsten Froberg,et al.  Equating accelerometer estimates among youth: The Rosetta Stone 2. , 2016, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[29]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Age group comparability of raw accelerometer output from wrist- and hip-worn monitors. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  Joss Langford,et al.  Autocalibration of accelerometer data for free-living physical activity assessment using local gravity and temperature: an evaluation on four continents , 2014, Journal of applied physiology.

[31]  Richard P Troiano,et al.  Evolution of accelerometer methods for physical activity research , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[32]  Paul D Loprinzi,et al.  The Relationship of Actigraph Accelerometer Cut-Points for Estimating Physical Activity With Selected Health Outcomes , 2012, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[33]  D. Bassett,et al.  Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[34]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Normal walking speed: a descriptive meta-analysis. , 2011, Physiotherapy.

[35]  David R Bassett,et al.  2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[36]  D. Warburton,et al.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[37]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.