The 2016 US Presidential Election on Facebook: An Exploratory Analysis of Sentiments

Social media platforms are valuable tools for political campaigns. In this study, we analyze a dataset representing over 22 thousand Facebook posts by candidates and over 48 million comments to understand the nature of online discourse. Specifically, we study the interaction between political candidates and the public during the 2016 presidential elections in the United States. We outline a novel method to classify commentators into four groups: strong supporters, supporters, dissenters, and strong dissenters. Comments by each group on policy-related topics are analyzed using sentiment analysis. Finally, we discuss avenues for future research to study the dynamics of social media platforms and political campaigns.

[1]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[2]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[3]  Roman Gerodimos,et al.  Obama’s 2012 Facebook Campaign: Political Communication in the Age of the Like Button , 2015 .

[4]  Jacob Groshek,et al.  Social media and personal attacks: A comparative perspective on co-creation and political advertising in presidential campaigns on YouTube , 2012, First Monday.

[5]  Ruthann Weaver Lariscy,et al.  Candidates Make Good Friends: An Analysis of Candidates' Uses of Facebook , 2008 .

[6]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Markers of Psychological Change Surrounding September 11, 2001 , 2004, Psychological science.

[7]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? , 2009, ePart.

[8]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media Use for News and Individuals' Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation , 2012, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  Juliet E. Carlisle,et al.  Is Social Media Changing How We Understand Political Engagement? An Analysis of Facebook and the 2008 Presidential Election , 2013 .

[10]  Kyung Hyan Yoo,et al.  Comparison of Deceptive and Truthful Travel Reviews , 2009, ENTER.

[11]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement , 2014 .

[12]  H. G. D. Zúñiga,et al.  Social Media, Political Expression, and Political Participation: Panel Analysis of Lagged and Concurrent Relationships , 2014 .

[13]  Petr Sojka,et al.  Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora , 2010 .

[14]  W. Lowe,et al.  Does Facebook increase political participation? Evidence from a field experiment , 2016 .

[15]  F. Pukelsheim.  The Three Sigma Rule , 1994 .

[16]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Online Video “Friends” Social Networking: Overlapping Online Public Spheres in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election , 2010 .

[17]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[18]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square , 2012 .

[20]  Lucia Vesnic-Alujevic,et al.  Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: a case study of Facebook , 2012 .

[21]  D. Romer,et al.  Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking Meets Offline Civic Engagement , 2009 .

[22]  Anthony M. Limperos,et al.  The 2008 Presidential Election, 2.0: A Content Analysis of User-Generated Political Facebook Groups , 2010 .

[23]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[24]  Jeffrey C. Neely,et al.  The Writing on the Wall: A Content Analysis of College Students' Facebook Groups for the 2008 Presidential Election , 2010 .

[25]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies , 2014 .

[26]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections , 2013, New Media Soc..

[27]  Daniel S. Lane,et al.  Sharing beyond Slacktivism: the effect of socially observable prosocial media sharing on subsequent offline helping behavior , 2017 .

[28]  Derrick L. Cogburn,et al.  From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign , 2011 .

[29]  Masahiro Yamamoto,et al.  Did Social Media Really Matter? College Students' Use of Online Media and Political Decision Making in the 2008 Election , 2010 .

[30]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  On Lying and Being Lied To: A Linguistic Analysis of Deception in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2007 .

[31]  A. Graesser,et al.  Pronoun Use Reflects Standings in Social Hierarchies , 2014 .

[32]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[33]  J. Groshek,et al.  Public Sentiment and Critical Framing in Social Media Content During the 2012 U.S. Presidential Campaign , 2013 .

[34]  Cindy K. Chung,et al.  When Small Words Foretell Academic Success: The Case of College Admissions Essays , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  It's Complicated: Facebook Users' Political Participation in the 2008 Election , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  R. Gibson,et al.  Do Online Election Campaigns Win Votes? The 2007 Australian “YouTube” Election , 2011 .

[37]  Nils Gustafsson,et al.  The subtle nature of Facebook politics: Swedish social network site users and political participation , 2012, New Media Soc..

[38]  C. Williams,et al.  Facebook Grows Up: An Empirical Assessment of its Role in the 2008 Congressional Elections , 2009 .