Prevention of Nosocomial Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Through Computerized Feedback to Physicians and a Nurse-Directed Protocol

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) represent the most common nosocomial infection. The authors’ baseline rate of CAUTI for general medical service was elevated at 36 per 1000 catheter-days. The medical literature has consistently linked inappropriate catheter use with the development of CAUTI. The baseline data also revealed a high rate of inappropriate use of indwelling urinary catheters. Using the dual modalities of technology through prompts in the computerized order/entry system and handheld bladder scanners, as well as in combination with staff education and nurse empowerment, the authors were successful in reducing the use and duration of urinary catheters as well as the incidence of CAUTI. In subsequent data collection cycles over the following 2 years, 81% reduction in device use and a 73% reduction in the clinical end point of nosocomial CAUTI (36/1000 catheter-days to 11/1000 catheter-days; P < .001) was demonstrated.

[1]  J. Burke,et al.  Infection control - a problem for patient safety. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Betsy Foxman,et al.  Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. , 2002, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Maki,et al.  The Direct Costs of Nosocomial Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in the Era of Managed Care , 2002, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[4]  J W Warren,et al.  Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. , 1997, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[5]  S. Saint,et al.  Are physicians aware of which of their patients have indwelling urinary catheters? , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[6]  P. Tambyah,et al.  Catheter-associated urinary tract infection is rarely symptomatic: a prospective study of 1,497 catheterized patients. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[7]  P. Tambyah,et al.  The relationship between pyuria and infection in patients with indwelling urinary catheters: a prospective study of 761 patients. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  D. Haas,et al.  Prevalence and risk factors for multidrug resistant uropathogens in ED patients. , 2000, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  S. Saint.  Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. , 2000, American journal of infection control.

[10]  D. Maki,et al.  Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Is Rarely Symptomatic A Prospective Study of 1497 Catheterized Patients , 2000 .

[11]  P. Reagan-Cirincione,et al.  A Decade of Prevalence Surveys in a Tertiary-Care Center: Trends in Nosocomial Infection Rates, Device Utilization, and Patient Acuity , 1999, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  S. Saint,et al.  Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: should we? Can we? How? , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  J. Elmore,et al.  The Efficacy of Silver Alloy-Coated Urinary Catheters in Preventing Urinary Tract Infection: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[14]  P Jain,et al.  Overuse of the indwelling urinary tract catheter in hospitalized medical patients. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  W. Stamm.  Catheter-associated urinary tract infections: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and prevention. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  W. Stamm.  Guidelines for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. , 1975, Annals of internal medicine.