A General Unified Framework to Assess the Sampling Variance of Heritability Estimates Using Pedigree or Marker-Based Relationships

Heritability is a population parameter of importance in evolution, plant and animal breeding, and human medical genetics. It can be estimated using pedigree designs and, more recently, using relationships estimated from markers. We derive the sampling variance of the estimate of heritability for a wide range of experimental designs, assuming that estimation is by maximum likelihood and that the resemblance between relatives is solely due to additive genetic variation. We show that well-known results for balanced designs are special cases of a more general unified framework. For pedigree designs, the sampling variance is inversely proportional to the variance of relationship in the pedigree and it is proportional to 1/N, whereas for population samples it is approximately proportional to 1/N2, where N is the sample size. Variation in relatedness is a key parameter in the quantification of the sampling variance of heritability. Consequently, the sampling variance is high for populations with large recent effective population size (e.g., humans) because this causes low variation in relationship. However, even using human population samples, low sampling variance is possible with high N.

[1]  B S Weir,et al.  Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage. , 2011, Genetics research.

[2]  E. Thompson,et al.  Estimating polygenic models for multivariate data on large pedigrees. , 1992, Genetics.

[3]  John Blangero,et al.  A kernel of truth: statistical advances in polygenic variance component models for complex human pedigrees. , 2013, Advances in genetics.

[4]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1962 .

[5]  P. Visscher,et al.  Estimation and partition of heritability in human populations using whole-genome analysis methods. , 2013, Annual review of genetics.

[6]  K. Ritland.  Marker‐inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[7]  Robin Thompson,et al.  Sources of information for estimating heritability from selection experiments , 1994 .

[8]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of heritability for human height , 2011 .

[9]  J. Cheverud.  Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits , 1999 .

[10]  P. Visscher,et al.  Inference of the genetic architecture underlying BMI and height with the use of 20,240 sibling pairs. , 2013, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  Abel M. Rodrigues.  Matrix Algebra Useful for Statistics , 2007 .

[12]  Pak Chung Sham,et al.  Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits , 2003, Bioinform..

[13]  M. Goddard.  Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response , 2009, Genetica.

[14]  Gustavo de los Campos,et al.  Inferences from Genomic Models in Stratified Populations , 2012, Genetics.

[15]  Manuel A. R. Ferreira,et al.  Assumption-Free Estimation of Heritability from Genome-Wide Identity-by-Descent Sharing between Full Siblings , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[16]  J Blangero,et al.  Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect quantitative trait loci. , 1999, Annals of human genetics.

[17]  Ying Liu,et al.  FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies , 2011, Nature Methods.

[18]  M. Lynch,et al.  Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits , 1996 .

[19]  Pak Chung Sham,et al.  Analytic approaches to twin data using structural equation models , 2002, Briefings Bioinform..

[20]  A. Thapar,et al.  Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families , 1993 .

[21]  R. Shaw.  MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD APPROACHES APPLIED TO QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF NATURAL POPULATIONS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Naomi R. Wray,et al.  Statistical Power to Detect Genetic (Co)Variance of Complex Traits Using SNP Data in Unrelated Samples , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[23]  Pak C Sham,et al.  Analytic power calculation for QTL linkage analysis of small pedigrees , 2001, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[24]  H. D. Patterson,et al.  Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal , 1971 .

[25]  D. Garrick,et al.  Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genome partitioning of genetic variation for height from 11,214 sibling pairs. , 2007, American journal of human genetics.

[27]  E A Thompson,et al.  Pedigree analysis for quantitative traits: variance components without matrix inversion. , 1990, Biometrics.

[28]  L. Almasy,et al.  Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  J. Pemberton,et al.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters in wild populations: a comparison of pedigree and genomic approaches , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[30]  J. Slate,et al.  Partitioning of genetic variation across the genome using multimarker methods in a wild bird population , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[31]  M. Goddard,et al.  Using the genomic relationship matrix to predict the accuracy of genomic selection. , 2011, Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie.

[32]  Stuart C Thomas,et al.  The estimation of genetic relationships using molecular markers and their efficiency in estimating heritability in natural populations , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Estimation of heritability from limited family data using genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing , 2012, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[34]  W. G. Hill.  On estimation of genetic variance within families using genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing , 2013, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[35]  K. Liang,et al.  Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests under Nonstandard Conditions , 1987 .

[36]  E. Thompson,et al.  Power and Effective Study Size Based on Approximations to the Expected Likelihood Ratio Test in Heritability Studies , 2014 .

[37]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.