Nanopatterned polymer surfaces with bactericidal properties.

Bacteria that adhere to the surfaces of implanted medical devices can cause catastrophic infection. Since chemical modifications of materials' surfaces have poor long-term performance in preventing bacterial buildup, approaches using bactericidal physical surface topography have been investigated. The authors used Nanoimprint Lithography was used to fabricate a library of biomimetic nanopillars on the surfaces of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) films. After incubation of Escherichia coli (E. coli) on the structured PMMA surfaces, pillared surfaces were found to have lower densities of adherent cells compared to flat films (67%-91% of densities on flat films). Moreover, of the E. coli that did adhere a greater fraction of them were dead on pillared surfaces (16%-141% higher dead fraction than on flat films). Smaller more closely spaced nanopillars had better performance. The smallest most closely spaced nanopillars were found to reduce the bacterial load in contaminated aqueous suspensions by 50% over a 24-h period compared to flat controls. Through quantitative analysis of cell orientation data, it was determined that the minimum threshold for optimal nanopillar spacing is between 130 and 380 nm. Measurements of bacterial cell length indicate that nanopillars adversely affect E. coli morphology, eliciting a filamentous response. Taken together, this work shows that imprinted polymer nanostructures with precisely defined geometries can kill bacteria without any chemical modifications. These results effectively translate bactericidal nanopillar topographies to PMMA, an important polymer used for medical devices.

[1]  D. LaJeunesse,et al.  Adhesion-dependent rupturing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on biological antimicrobial nanostructured surfaces , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[2]  Saulius Juodkazis,et al.  Bactericidal activity of black silicon , 2013, Nature Communications.

[3]  Mark J. Tobin,et al.  Molecular Organization of the Nanoscale Surface Structures of the Dragonfly Hemianax papuensis Wing Epicuticle , 2013, PloS one.

[4]  Elena P Ivanova,et al.  Biophysical model of bacterial cell interactions with nanopatterned cicada wing surfaces. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Michelle Khine,et al.  Shrink-Induced Superhydrophobic and Antibacterial Surfaces in Consumer Plastics , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Elena P Ivanova,et al.  Natural bactericidal surfaces: mechanical rupture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells by cicada wings. , 2012, Small.

[7]  B. Maier,et al.  Three-dimensional obstacles for bacterial surface motility. , 2012, Small.

[8]  Philseok Kim,et al.  Control of bacterial biofilm growth on surfaces by nanostructural mechanics and geometry , 2011, Nanotechnology.

[9]  Shravanthi T. Reddy,et al.  Micropatterned surfaces for reducing the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection: an in vitro study on the effect of sharklet micropatterned surfaces to inhibit bacterial colonization and migration of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[10]  Tong Zhang,et al.  Title Optimization of fixation methods for observation of bacterial cell morphology and surface ultrastructures by atomic force microscopy , 2011 .

[11]  Ravi S Kane,et al.  Antifouling Coatings: Recent Developments in the Design of Surfaces That Prevent Fouling by Proteins, Bacteria, and Marine Organisms , 2011, Advanced materials.

[12]  L Ploux,et al.  The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometre scale. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  Bacteria pattern spontaneously on periodic nanostructure arrays. , 2010, Nano letters.

[14]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[15]  D. Grainger,et al.  The inhibition of the adhesion of clinically isolated bacterial strains on multi-component cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol)-based polymer coatings. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[16]  James F. Schumacher,et al.  Impact of engineered surface microtopography on biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus , 2007, Biointerphases.

[17]  Dae Hong Jeong,et al.  Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. , 2007, Nanomedicine : nanotechnology, biology, and medicine.

[18]  L. J. Guo,et al.  Nanoimprint Lithography: Methods and Material Requirements , 2007 .

[19]  Zhongfan Liu,et al.  Cicada wings: a stamp from nature for nanoimprint lithography. , 2006, Small.

[20]  K. Young The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape , 2006, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[21]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[22]  Hyewon Kang,et al.  An improved method of preparing composite poly(dimethylsiloxane) moulds , 2006 .

[23]  Adam W Feinberg,et al.  Engineered antifouling microtopographies – correlating wettability with cell attachment , 2006, Biofouling.

[24]  Y. Missirlis,et al.  Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. , 2004, European cells & materials.

[25]  I. Sondi,et al.  Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[26]  D. Davies,et al.  Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Improved pattern transfer in soft lithography using composite stamps , 2002 .

[28]  Y. An,et al.  Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[29]  H. Suh,et al.  Bacterial adhesion on PEG modified polyurethane surfaces. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[30]  A. Gristina,et al.  Biomaterial-centered infection: microbial adhesion versus tissue integration. , 1987, Science.

[31]  R. Kolter,et al.  Biofilm formation as microbial development. , 2000, Annual review of microbiology.