Definition of historical models of gene function and their relation to students’ understanding of genetics

Models are often used when teaching science. In this paper historical models and students’ ideas about genetics are compared. The historical development of the scientific idea of the gene and its function is described and categorized into five historical models of gene function. Differences and similarities between these historical models are made explicit. Internal and external consistency problems between the models are identified and discussed. From the consistency analysis seven epistemological features are identified. The features vary in such ways between the historical models that it is claimed that learning difficulties might be the consequence if these features are not explicitly addressed when teaching genetics. Students’ understanding of genetics, as described in science education literature, is then examined. The comparison shows extensive parallelism between students’ alternative understanding of genetics and the epistemological features, i.e., the claim is strengthened. It is also argued that, when teaching gene function, the outlined historical models could be useful in a combined nature of science and history of science approach. Our findings also raise the question what to teach in relation to preferred learning outcomes in genetics.

[1]  Thomas Fogle,et al.  Are genes units of inheritance? , 1990 .

[2]  J. Gayon The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: From Measurement to Organization: A Philosophical Scheme for the History of the Concept of Heredity , 2000 .

[3]  Hans-Jörg Rheinberger,et al.  Gene concepts : fragments from the perspective of molecular biology , 2000 .

[4]  E. Mayr The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance , 1983 .

[5]  E. Keller,et al.  Decoding the Genetic Program: Or, Some Circular Logic in the Logic of Circularity , 2000 .

[6]  S. Schwartz The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: The Differential Concept of the Gene: Past and Present , 2000 .

[7]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Developing Models in Science Education , 2000 .

[8]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Neutral models in biology , 1987 .

[9]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Revisiting learning difficulties in biology , 1999 .

[10]  Alexander Rosenberg,et al.  The structure of biological science , 1986 .

[11]  B. Snel,et al.  A global definition of expression context is conserved between orthologs, but does not correlate with sequence conservation , 2006, BMC Genomics.

[12]  C. Wood-Robinson Young People's Ideas about Inheritance and Evolution , 1994 .

[13]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Positioning Models in Science Education and in Design and Technology Education , 2000 .

[14]  C. Kenneth Waters,et al.  Genes Made Molecular , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[15]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[16]  J. Ogborn,et al.  Metaphorical reasoning about genetics , 1997 .

[17]  P. Lawrence Drosophila Unfolded. (Book Reviews: The Making of a Fly. The Genetics of Animal Design.) , 1992 .

[18]  Barbara C. Buckley,et al.  Constructing a Typology of Models for Science Education , 2000 .

[19]  Harold Kincaid,et al.  Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science , 1990, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  E. Carlson Mendel's legacy : the origin of classical genetics , 2004 .

[21]  Hans-Jörg Rheinberger,et al.  The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution , 2008 .

[22]  M.C.P.J. Knippels,et al.  Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education : The yo-yo learning and teaching strategy , 2002 .

[23]  James R. Griesemer,et al.  The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: Reproduction and the Reduction of Genetics , 2000 .

[24]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Models in explanations, Part 1 : Horses for courses? , 1998 .

[25]  R. Giere The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Theories , 1994, Philosophy of Science.

[26]  P. Griffiths,et al.  The many faces of the gene , 1999 .

[27]  Lost: One Gene Concept. Reward to Finder , 2002 .

[28]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Exploring Conceptual Change in Genetics Using a Multidimensional Interpretive Framework. , 1998 .

[29]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Authentic School Science , 1995 .

[30]  E. Carlson Defining the gene: an evolving concept. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  Modeling Theory in Science Education , 2004 .

[32]  Norman G. Lederman Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .

[33]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science , 2000 .

[34]  Robert Hafner,et al.  Extending the conception of “problem” in problem‐solving research , 1991 .

[35]  P. Portin,et al.  The Concept of the Gene: Short History and Present Status , 1993, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[36]  J. Kinnear Using an Historical Perspective to Enrich the Teaching of Linkage in Genetics. , 1991 .

[37]  Rosária Justi,et al.  A cause of ahistorical science teaching: Use of hybrid models , 1999 .

[38]  John Leach,et al.  Chromosomes: the missing link — young people's understanding of mitosis, meiosis, and fertilisation , 2000 .

[39]  E. Mayr This Is Biology: The Science of the Living World , 1997 .

[40]  S. Gilbert Model building and a definition of science , 1991 .

[41]  R. Harré The Principles Of Scientific Thinking , 1970 .

[42]  Michelle Pashley A-level students: their problems with gene and allele , 1994 .

[43]  John Leach,et al.  Young peoplea's understanding of the nature of genetic information in the cells of an organism , 2000 .

[44]  David F. Treagust,et al.  A typology of school science models , 2000 .

[45]  John Leach,et al.  All in the genes? — young people's understanding of the nature of genes , 2000 .

[46]  Carol L. Smith,et al.  Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts , 1991 .

[47]  M. Singer,et al.  Genes and Genomes: A Changing Perspective , 1990 .

[48]  D. Kuhn,et al.  The development of scientific thinking skills , 1988 .

[49]  Gili Marbach-Ad,et al.  Attempting to break the code in student comprehension of genetic concepts , 2001 .

[50]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena , 2000 .

[51]  H. Rheinberger,et al.  From molecular genetics to genomics : the mapping cultures of twentieth-century genetics , 2004 .

[52]  R. Giere Cognitive Models of Science , 1992 .

[53]  Hans-Jörg Rheinberger,et al.  From Gene to Genetic Hierarchy: Richard Goldschmidt and the Problem of the Gene , 2000 .

[54]  Elof Axel Carlson The gene: a critical history , 1966 .

[55]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Teachers' Knowledge of Models and Modelling in Science. , 1999 .

[56]  T. Kuhn The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[57]  Cynthia Passmore,et al.  A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools , 2002 .

[58]  E. Finkel MAKING SENSE OF GENETICS : STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE USE DURING PROBLEM SOLVING IN A HIGH SCHOOL GENETICS CLASS , 1996 .

[59]  Marcel Weber,et al.  Representing genes: classical mapping techniques and the growth of genetical knowledge , 1998 .

[60]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Traits, genes, particles and information: re‐visiting students’ understandings of genetics , 2004 .

[61]  M. R. Matthews,et al.  History, philosophy, and science teaching: The present rapprochement , 1992 .

[62]  P. Clément,et al.  Teaching ‘biological identity’ as genome/environment interactions , 2003 .

[63]  Ann M. L. Cavallo,et al.  Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students' understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics , 1996 .

[64]  John L. Rudolph,et al.  Considering the nature of scientific problems when designing science curricula , 2001 .

[65]  Thomas Fogle,et al.  The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution: The Dissolution of Protein Coding Genes in Molecular Biology , 2000 .

[66]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  Isolating topics of high perceived difficulty school biology , 1980 .

[67]  Sahotra Sarkar,et al.  From the Reaktionsnorm to the Adaptive Norm: The Norm of Reaction, 1909–1960 , 1999 .

[68]  W. Leatherdale The role of analogy, model, and metaphor in science , 1974 .

[69]  Jenny M. Lewis,et al.  Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance - do students see any relationship? , 2000 .

[70]  E. Banet,et al.  Teaching genetics at secondary school: A strategy for teaching about the location of inheritance information , 2000 .