CSV: Image quality assessment based on color, structure, and visual system

Abstract This paper presents a full-reference image quality estimator based on color, structure, and visual system characteristics denoted as CSV. In contrast to the majority of existing methods, we quantify perceptual color degradations rather than absolute pixel-wise changes. We use the CIEDE2000, color difference formulation to quantify low-level color degradations and the Earth Mover's Distance between color name probability vectors to measure significant color degradations. In addition to the perceptual color difference, CSV also contains structural and perceptual differences. Structural feature maps are obtained by mean subtraction and divisive normalization, and perceptual feature maps are obtained from contrast sensitivity formulations of retinal ganglion cells. The proposed quality estimator CSV is tested on the LIVE, the Multiply Distorted LIVE, and the TID 2013 databases, and it is always among the top two performing quality estimators in terms of at least ranking, monotonic behavior or linearity.

[1]  Ghassan Al-Regib,et al.  Image quality assessment and color difference , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[2]  T. Kinsman,et al.  Color is not a metric space implications for pattern recognition, machine learning, and computer vision , 2012, 2012 Western New York Image Processing Workshop.

[3]  Michael Werman,et al.  Improving Perceptual Color Difference using Basic Color Terms , 2012, ArXiv.

[4]  R A Young,et al.  The Gaussian derivative model for spatial vision: I. Retinal mechanisms. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[5]  Yang Yang,et al.  Color Image Quality Assessment Based on CIEDE2000 , 2012, Adv. Multim..

[6]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Reduced-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Divisive Normalization-Based Image Representation , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[8]  P. Kay Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution , 1969 .

[9]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Learning Color Names for Real-World Applications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Yi Li,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Translation insensitive image similarity in complex wavelet domain , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[12]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment based on log-derivative statistics of natural scenes , 2013, J. Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Christian J. Van den Branden Lambrecht,et al.  Vision Models and Applications to Image and Video Processing , 2001 .

[14]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  Reduced-reference quality assessment based on the entropy of DNT coefficients of locally weighted gradients , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[16]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Mark D. Fairchild,et al.  Measuring images: differences, quality, and appearance , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Scale Mixtures of Gaussians and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1999, NIPS.

[19]  Marco Carli,et al.  Modified image visual quality metrics for contrast change and mean shift accounting , 2011, 2011 11th International Conference The Experience of Designing and Application of CAD Systems in Microelectronics (CADSM).

[20]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and divisive normalization: Modeling nonlinearity and adaptation in cortical neurons , 2002 .

[22]  Ghassan Al-Regib,et al.  PerSIM: Multi-resolution image quality assessment in the perceptually uniform color domain , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[23]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Objective quality assessment of multiply distorted images , 2012, 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[24]  Michael Werman,et al.  Fast and robust Earth Mover's Distances , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[25]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  J. Astola,et al.  ON BETWEEN-COEFFICIENT CONTRAST MASKING OF DCT BASIS FUNCTIONS , 2007 .

[27]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[28]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[29]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[30]  Eero P. Simoncelli Statistical models for images: compression, restoration and synthesis , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).

[31]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  Image database TID2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives , 2015, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[32]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Shiftable multiscale transforms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[33]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.