Impact of individually controlled facially applied air movement on perceived air quality at high humidity

Abstract The effect of facially applied air movement on perceived air quality (PAQ) at high humidity was studied. Thirty subjects (21 males and 9 females) participated in three, 3-h experiments performed in a climate chamber. The experimental conditions covered three combinations of relative humidity and local air velocity under a constant air temperature of 26 °C, namely: 70% relative humidity without air movement, 30% relative humidity without air movement and 70% relative humidity with air movement under isothermal conditions. Personalized ventilation was used to supply room air from the front toward the upper part of the body (upper chest, head). The subjects could control the flow rate (velocity) of the supplied air in the vicinity of their bodies. The results indicate an airflow with elevated velocity applied to the face significantly improves the acceptability of the air quality at the room air temperature of 26 °C and relative humidity of 70%.

[1]  P. Fanger,et al.  Upper limits of air humidity for preventing warm respiratory discomfort , 1998 .

[2]  Thomas Bedford,et al.  Basic principles of ventilation and heating , 1948 .

[3]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on the Perception of Indoor Air Quality , 1998 .

[4]  P. Fanger.  Moderate Thermal Environments Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort , 1984 .

[5]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  New air terminal devices with high efficiency for personalized ventilation application , 2003 .

[6]  P. Fanger,et al.  Upper limits for indoor air humidity to avoid uncomfortably humid skin , 1998 .

[7]  P. Fanger,et al.  ADAPTATION TO INDOOR AIR POLLUTION , 1992 .

[8]  Jørn Toftum,et al.  Remote Performance Measurement (RPM) – A new, internet-based method for the measurement of occupant performance in office buildings , 2005 .

[9]  Standard Ashrae.  Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[10]  Bradley Prezant,et al.  Recognition, Evaluation, and Control of Indoor Mold , 2008 .

[11]  A. Melikov,et al.  Effect of warm air supplied facially on occupants' comfort , 2010 .

[12]  E. R. Mcfadden,et al.  Respiratory heat and water exchange: physiological and clinical implications. , 1983, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[13]  P. Fanger,et al.  Impact of Temperature and Humidity on Perception of Indoor Air Quality During Immediate and Longer Whole‐Body Exposures , 1998 .

[14]  P. Fanger,et al.  Human response to personalized ventilation and mixing ventilation. , 2004, Indoor air.

[15]  Fred Bauman,et al.  Field study of the impact of a desktop task/ambient conditioning system in office buildings , 1998 .

[16]  Arsen Krikor Melikov,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality ( IEQ ) Title Energy saving and improved comfort by increased air movement , 2008 .

[17]  Donald F. Proctor,et al.  The Nose, upper airway physiology and the atmospheric environment , 1982 .

[18]  J. E. Janssen,et al.  Ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality , 1989 .

[19]  T. Keck,et al.  Temperature Profile in the Nasal Cavity , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  Chandra Sekhar,et al.  Energy analysis of the personalized ventilation system in hot and humid climates , 2010 .

[21]  Fred Bauman,et al.  Impact of a task-ambient ventilation system on perceived air quality , 2008 .

[22]  Povl Ole Fanger,et al.  Findings of Personalized Ventilation Studies in a Hot and Humid Climate , 2005 .