The Effect of Visual Uncertainty on Implicit Motor Adaptation

Sensorimotor adaptation is driven by sensory prediction errors, the difference between the predicted and actual feedback. When the position of the feedback is made uncertain, adaptation is attenuated. This effect, in the context of optimal sensory integration models, has been attributed to a weakening of the error signal driving adaptation. Here we consider an alternative hypothesis, namely that uncertainty alters the perceived location of the feedback. We present two visuomotor adaptation experiments to compare these hypotheses, varying the size and uncertainty of a visual error signal. Uncertainty attenuated learning when the error size was small but had no effect when the error size was large. This pattern of results favors the hypothesis that uncertainty does not impact the strength of the error signal, but rather, leads to mis-localization of the error. We formalize these ideas to offer a novel perspective on the effect of visual uncertainty on implicit sensorimotor adaptation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Current models of sensorimotor adaptation assume that the rate of learning will be related to properties of the error signal (e.g., size, consistency, relevance). Recent evidence has challenged this view, pointing to a rigid, modular system, one that automatically recalibrates the sensorimotor map in response to movement errors, with minimal constraint. In light of these developments, this study revisits the influence of feedback uncertainty on sensorimotor adaptation. Adaptation was attenuated in response to a noisy feedback signal, but the effect was only manifest for small errors and not for large errors. This interaction suggests that uncertainty does not weaken the error signal. Rather, it may influence the perceived location of the feedback and thus the change in the sensorimotor map induced by that error. These ideas are formalized to show how the motor system remains exquisitely calibrated, even if adaptation is largely insensitive to the statistics of error signals.

[1]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Uncertainty of Feedback and State Estimation Determines the Speed of Motor Adaptation , 2009, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[2]  M. D. Ernst Permutation Methods: A Basis for Exact Inference , 2004 .

[3]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Flexible Cognitive Strategies during Motor Learning , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[4]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry,et al.  Internal model recalibration does not deteriorate with age while motor adaptation does , 2019, Neurobiology of Aging.

[6]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[7]  M. Schervish,et al.  Bayes Factors: What They are and What They are Not , 1999 .

[8]  G. M. Redding,et al.  Adaptive spatial alignment and strategic perceptual-motor control. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  D. Nozaki,et al.  Simultaneous Processing of Information on Multiple Errors in Visuomotor Learning , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  B Wallace,et al.  Calibration and Alignment are Separable: Evidence From Prism Adaptation , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Combining Priors and Noisy Visual Cues in a Rapid Pointing Task , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[13]  Darius E. Parvin,et al.  Credit Assignment in a Motor Decision Making Task Is Influenced by Agency and Not Sensory Prediction Errors , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Michael S Landy,et al.  Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[16]  M. Sigman,et al.  Statistical inference of body representation in the macaque brain , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Reza Moazzezi,et al.  Invariant errors reveal limitations in motor correction rather than constraints on error sensitivity , 2017, Communications Biology.

[18]  Daichi Nozaki,et al.  Divisively Normalized Integration of Multisensory Error Information Develops Motor Memories Specific to Vision and Proprioception , 2019, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Krista M Bond,et al.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  R. Ivry,et al.  Delayed feedback during sensorimotor learning selectively disrupts adaptation but not strategy use. , 2016, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[22]  Hyosub E. Kim,et al.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning. , 2020, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Multisensory Integration during Motor Planning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  J. Krakauer,et al.  An Implicit Plan Overrides an Explicit Strategy during Visuomotor Adaptation , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Jordan A Taylor,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Processes Constitute the Fast and Slow Processes of Sensorimotor Learning , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Richard B Ivry,et al.  Re-exposure to a sensorimotor perturbation produces opposite effects on explicit and implicit learning processes , 2020 .

[28]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[29]  Albert Jin Chung,et al.  Perception of Body Ownership Is Driven by Bayesian Sensory Inference , 2015, PloS one.

[30]  Guy Avraham,et al.  Environmental Consistency Modulation of Error Sensitivity During Motor Adaptation is Explicitly Controlled , 2019, bioRxiv.

[31]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation? , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Ulrik R. Beierholm,et al.  Causal inference in perception , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Scott E. Bevans,et al.  Effect of visual error size on saccade adaptation in monkey. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Matthew J. Crossley,et al.  Credit assignment in movement-dependent reinforcement learning , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[36]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[37]  David M. Huberdeau,et al.  The Influence of Movement Preparation Time on the Expression of Visuomotor Learning and Savings , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Estimating the Relevance of World Disturbances to Explain Savings, Interference and Long-Term Motor Adaptation Effects , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  Mathias Hegele,et al.  Implicit and explicit components of dual adaptation to visuomotor rotations , 2010, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  Benjamin Wallace,et al.  Generalization of prism adaptation. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Characteristics of Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation Revealed by Task-irrelevant Clamped Feedback , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  O. Donchin,et al.  Awareness of Sensorimotor Adaptation to Visual Rotations of Different Size , 2015, PloS one.

[43]  Robert J. van Beers,et al.  How Does Our Motor System Determine Its Learning Rate? , 2012, PloS one.

[44]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Modeling Sensorimotor Learning with Linear Dynamical Systems , 2006, Neural Computation.

[45]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  Continuous Reports of Sensed Hand Position During Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2020, bioRxiv.

[46]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Trial-by-trial transformation of error into sensorimotor adaptation changes with environmental dynamics. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[47]  Daniël Lakens,et al.  Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[48]  Mollie K. Marko,et al.  Sensitivity to prediction error in reach adaptation. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Generalization and Multirate Models of Motor Adaptation , 2012, Neural Computation.

[50]  R. Held,et al.  Adaptation to displaced and delayed visual feedback from the hand. , 1966 .

[51]  Shigeru Kitazawa,et al.  Prism adaptation with delayed visual error signals in the monkey , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  A Shared Resource between Declarative Memory and Motor Memory , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Modulation of error-sensitivity during a prism adaptation task in people with cerebellar degeneration. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[54]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Explicit and Implicit Contributions to Learning in a Sensorimotor Adaptation Task , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Causal Inference in Multisensory Perception , 2007, PloS one.

[56]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[57]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 2005 .

[58]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Error correction, sensory prediction, and adaptation in motor control. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.