Evaluation of statistical turbulence models for use in the Distributed Kalman Filter

The Kalman Filter (KF) application to wavefront control in Adaptive Optics (AO) shows great promise with respect to achieving the best atmospheric turbulence error rejection, provided an adequate model for the turbulence temporal dynamics exists. The advent of the computationally efficient Distributed Kalman Filter (DKF) algorithm makes the KF approach especially attractive for the future of high DOF AO systems (As is the case in the Extremely Large Telescope class). In this work we try to address a significant drawback of the existing DKF state space model, which is too simplistic (single parameter scalar diagonal state matrix) to describe the atmosphere turbulence dynamics. We investigate a broader family of Block-Toeplitz with Toeplitz Blocks (BTTB) state matrices, which, on one hand, are able to better grasp statistical properties of the turbulence to provide significantly better prediction power and, on the other hand, preserve the shift invariance property, a corner stone of the DKF algorithm. We demonstrate the capabilities of the new model in the end-to-end simulations of the DKF-driven Single Conjugate AO system.

[1]  Donald T. Gavel,et al.  Toward Strehl-optimizing adaptive optics controllers , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[2]  Jean-Marc Conan,et al.  Fast computation of an optimal controller for large-scale adaptive optics. , 2011, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Piotr Piatrou,et al.  Performance study of Kalman filter controller for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2007, Applied optics.

[4]  Michel Tallon,et al.  Fast minimum variance wavefront reconstruction for extremely large telescopes. , 2010, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Luc Gilles,et al.  Adaptive distributed Kalman filtering with wind estimation for astronomical adaptive optics. , 2015, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  J. Seguel,et al.  Four years of optical turbulence monitoring at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) , 2009 .

[7]  B. Welsh,et al.  Imaging Through Turbulence , 1996 .

[8]  Brent L Ellerbroek,et al.  Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Richard W. Wilson,et al.  SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor , 2002 .

[10]  Lisa Poyneer,et al.  Experimental verification of the frozen flow atmospheric turbulence assumption with use of astronomical adaptive optics telemetry. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Jeffrey B. Burl,et al.  Linear Optimal Control: H(2) and H (Infinity) Methods , 1998 .