Evaluating the effects of capacity constraints and demand patterns on supply chain replenishment strategies

This research considers inventory replenishment in a stochastic, multi-echelon supply chain involving both production and distribution functions. Simulation is used to compare distribution/material requirements planning (DRP/MRP), re-order point (ROP) and Kanban (KBN) replenishment strategies. Additional experimental factors include the demand pattern and the existence of manufacturing capacity constraints. Trade-off curves between inventory and delivery performance are generated. Statistical techniques, including analysis of variance (ANOVA), are then used to compare the areas under the trade-off curves and determine the relative dominance among the replenishment strategies. The methodology is used to identify both main and interaction effects. With seasonal demand, DRP/MRP performance is found to be best, followed by ROP and KBN, respectively. Without seasonal demand, the relative performance ranking depends on the presence of capacity constraints. Without capacity constraints, ROP performs best, followed by DRP/MRP and KBN. With capacity constraints, the ranking is reversed. This difference in behaviour can be explained using queuing analysis.

[1]  Sangjin Choi,et al.  Use of GI/G/1 queuing approximations to set tactical parameters for the simulation of MRP systems , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[2]  W. Whitt,et al.  The Queueing Network Analyzer , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[3]  S. T. Enns,et al.  Comparison of supply chain replenishment strategies in a non-capacitated distribution system , 2007 .

[4]  Sven Axsäter,et al.  Multi-level production-inventory control: Material requirements planning or reorder point policies? , 1994 .

[5]  Robert L. Bregman.  An analytical framework for comparing material requirements planning to reorder point systems , 1994 .

[6]  F. Robert Jacobs,et al.  A Comparison of Reorder Point and Material Requirements Planning Inventory Control Logic , 1992 .

[7]  Silvanus T. Enns,et al.  Evaluating the performance of supply chain simulations with tradeoffs between multiple objectives , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[8]  Silvanus T. Enns,et al.  Optimal lot-sizing with capacity constraints and auto-correlated interarrival times , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, 2004..

[9]  Kum Khiong Yang.  A comparison of Reorder Point and Kanban policies for a single machine production system , 1998 .

[10]  Robert Daniel Reid.  A comparative analysis of inventory planning systems in a multiechelon, multiproduct distribution system supplied by a limited capacity manufacturer , 1987 .

[11]  Rajan Suri,et al.  From CAN-Q to MPX: Evolution of Queuing Software for Manufacturing , 1995 .

[12]  Pattita Suwanruji,et al.  A simulation test bed for production and supply chain modeling , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[13]  Loren Paul Rees,et al.  A comparative analysis of an MRP lot-for-lot system and a Kanban system for a multistage production operation , 1989 .