Massachusetts health care reform and reduced racial disparities in minimally invasive surgery.

IMPORTANCE Racial disparities in receipt of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) persist in the United States and have been shown to also be associated with a number of driving factors, including insurance status. However, little is known as to how expanding insurance coverage across a population influences disparities in surgical care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of Massachusetts health care reform on racial disparities in MIS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study assessed the probability of undergoing MIS vs an open operation for nonwhite patients in Massachusetts compared with 6 control states. All discharges (n = 167,560) of nonelderly white, black, or Latino patients with government insurance (Medicaid or Commonwealth Care insurance) or no insurance who underwent a procedure for acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis at inpatient hospitals between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2009, were assessed. Data are from the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases. INTERVENTION The 2006 Massachusetts health care reform, which expanded insurance coverage for government-subsidized, self-pay, and uninsured individuals in Massachusetts. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Adjusted probability of undergoing MIS and difference-in-difference estimates. RESULTS Prior to the 2006 reform, Massachusetts nonwhite patients had a 5.21-percentage point lower probability of MIS relative to white patients (P < .001). Nonwhite patients in control states had a 1.39-percentage point lower probability of MIS (P = .007). After reform, nonwhite patients in Massachusetts had a 3.71-percentage point increase in the probability of MIS relative to concurrent trends in control states (P = .01). After 2006, measured racial disparities in MIS resolved in Massachusetts, with nonwhite patients having equal probability of MIS relative to white patients (0.06 percentage point greater; P = .96). However, nonwhite patients in control states without health care reform have a persistently lower probability of MIS relative to white patients (3.19 percentage points lower; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The 2006 Massachusetts insurance expansion was associated with an increased probability of nonwhite patients undergoing MIS and resolution of measured racial disparities in MIS.

[1]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Massachusetts Health Reform and Disparities in Coverage, Access and Health Status , 2010, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[2]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge.  Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[3]  Adrienne Y. Stith,et al.  Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care , 2005 .

[4]  E. Fisher,et al.  Racial Trends in the Use of Major Procedures among the Elderly , 2005 .

[5]  Jeremiah D. Schuur,et al.  Emergency department utilization after the implementation of Massachusetts health reform. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  D. Rattner,et al.  Factors Associated with Successful Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis , 1993, Annals of surgery.

[7]  Peter Shin,et al.  Safety-net providers after health care reform: lessons from Massachusetts. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  S. Long,et al.  Access and affordability: an update on health reform in Massachusetts, fall 2008. , 2009, Health affairs.

[9]  Amanda Kowalski,et al.  The Impact of Health Care Reform on Hospital and Preventive Care: Evidence from Massachusetts , 2010, Journal of public economics.

[10]  T. M. Bird,et al.  Racial disparities in the management of pediatric appenciditis. , 2006, The Journal of surgical research.

[11]  Randall S. Burd,et al.  Evaluation of Race and Insurance Status as Predictors of Undergoing Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[12]  W. Henderson,et al.  Racial variation in the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Department of Veterans Affairs medical system. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  C. Steiner,et al.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. , 1998, Medical care.

[14]  D. Pohl,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[15]  A. Moskowitz,et al.  Payer status and treatment paradigm for acute cholecystitis. , 2012, Archives of surgery.

[16]  N. Nguyen,et al.  Disparities in access to basic laparoscopic surgery at U.S. academic medical centers , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  R. Pietrobon,et al.  Insurance status and race represent independent predictors of undergoing laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis: secondary data analysis of 145,546 patients. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[18]  D. Smink,et al.  Access to emergency operative care: a comparative study between the Canadian and American health care systems. , 2009, Surgery.

[19]  P Parrilla,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs open cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis: a prospective study. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[20]  Hong-Bo Wei,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a metaanalysis , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  Alok Kapoor,et al.  Massachusetts Reform and Disparities in Inpatient Care Utilization , 2012, Medical care.

[22]  A. Zaslavsky,et al.  Effects of healthcare reforms on coverage, access, and disparities: quasi-experimental analysis of evidence from Massachusetts. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.