Sharp Thresholds of the Information Cascade Fragility Under a Mismatched Model

We analyze a sequential decision making model in which decision makers (or, players) take their decisions based on their own private information as well as the actions of previous decision makers. Such decision making processes often lead to what is known as the \emph{information cascade} or \emph{herding} phenomenon. Specifically, a cascade develops when it seems rational for some players to abandon their own private information and imitate the actions of earlier players. The risk, however, is that if the initial decisions were wrong, then the whole cascade will be wrong. Nonetheless, information cascade are known to be fragile: there exists a sequence of \emph{revealing} probabilities $\{p_{\ell}\}_{\ell\geq1}$, such that if with probability $p_{\ell}$ player $\ell$ ignores the decisions of previous players, and rely on his private information only, then wrong cascades can be avoided. Previous related papers which study the fragility of information cascades always assume that the revealing probabilities are known to all players perfectly, which might be unrealistic in practice. Accordingly, in this paper we study a mismatch model where players believe that the revealing probabilities are $\{q_\ell\}_{\ell\in\mathbb{N}}$ when they truly are $\{p_\ell\}_{\ell\in\mathbb{N}}$, and study the effect of this mismatch on information cascades. We consider both adversarial and probabilistic sequential decision making models, and derive closed-form expressions for the optimal learning rates at which the error probability associated with a certain decision maker goes to zero. We prove several novel phase transitions in the behaviour of the asymptotic learning rate.

[1]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[2]  Nat Sothanaphan,et al.  Naive Bayesian Learning in Social Networks , 2018, EC.

[3]  S. Bikhchandani,et al.  You have printed the following article : A Theory of Fads , Fashion , Custom , and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades , 2007 .

[4]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Information Cascades in the Laboratory , 1998 .

[5]  Omer Tamuz,et al.  The speed of sequential asymptotic learning , 2017, J. Econ. Theory.

[6]  Yuval Peres,et al.  How fragile are information cascades? , 2017, The Annals of Applied Probability.

[7]  Lones Smith,et al.  Pathological Outcomes of Observational Learning , 2000 .

[8]  D. Freedman On Tail Probabilities for Martingales , 1975 .

[9]  Georg Weizsäcker Do We Follow Others When We Should? A Simple Test of Rational Expectations , 2010 .

[10]  I. Welch,et al.  On the Evolution of Overconfidence and Entrepreneurs , 2001 .

[11]  Yu Cheng,et al.  A Deterministic Protocol for Sequential Asymptotic Learning , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the psychology of prediction , 1973 .

[13]  Joerg Oechssler,et al.  Informational cascades in the laboratory: Do they occur for the right reasons? , 2000 .

[14]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Classroom Games: Information Cascades , 1996 .

[15]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Opinion Exchange Dynamics , 2014, Probability Surveys.

[16]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Groupthink and the Failure of Information Aggregation in Large Groups , 2014 .

[17]  E. Todeva Networks , 2007 .

[18]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Douglas Gale,et al.  Bayesian learning in social networks , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[20]  Philipp Strack,et al.  Rational Groupthink , 2014, The Quarterly Journal of Economics.

[21]  Ilan Lobel,et al.  BAYESIAN LEARNING IN SOCIAL NETWORKS , 2008 .

[22]  Xiequan Fan,et al.  Exponential inequalities for martingales with applications , 2013, 1311.6273.

[23]  Chris Arney,et al.  Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World (Easley, D. and Kleinberg, J.; 2010) [Book Review] , 2013, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.