Visualizing self- and peer-assessment data by a self-organizing map for inducing awareness in learners

Selfand peer-assessments among learners are presumed to motivate learners to increase their learning and introspection. The basis behind this effect is the awareness resulting from differences between a self-assessment result and the assessment results from others. Therefore, to enable learners to benefit from selfand peer-assessments, we need to easily visualize results that make them aware of some factor that could improve their learning ability. In this study, we designed a system to visualize selfand peer-assessment data, which are many and multi-dimensional data, in such a way that we can easily grasp an overview at first glance. We then developed an actual system using a self-organizing map (SOM) as a method for visualizing selfand peer-assessment data. In a comparison of the visualization method in our developed system, SOM, and a conventional method, a radar chart, we showed the usefulness of our visualization method, SOM, through a subjective evaluation test and a statistical hypothesis test. In addition, we carried out an experiment in which people wrote reports, then conducted selfand peer-assessments of what they wrote by using the developed system. The experimental results showed that the visualization of selfand peer-assessment data enabled people to become aware of some factor that helped them to improve their

[1]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps , 2010 .

[2]  D. Chambers,et al.  The effects of student self-assessment on learning in removable prosthodontics laboratory. , 2014, Journal of dental education.

[3]  Terje Väljataga,et al.  Web-based self- and peer-assessment of teachers’ digital competencies , 2012, World Wide Web.

[4]  Justin Cheng,et al.  Peer and self assessment in massive online classes , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[5]  Antoni Jaume-i-Capó,et al.  Use of Social Networks to Motivate Computer-Engineering Students to Participate in Self-assessment Activities , 2014 .

[6]  Chi-Cheng Chang,et al.  A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Thomas R. Wotruba,et al.  The Use of Self-Ratings and Peer Ratings to Evaluate Performances of Student Group Members , 1998 .

[8]  Chao-hsiu Chen,et al.  The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Annelies Raes,et al.  What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Mark Lejk,et al.  The Effect of the Inclusion of Selfassessment with Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments , 2001 .

[11]  Maria WG Nijhuis-van der Sanden,et al.  Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: a mixed methods design , 2014, BMC medical education.

[12]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[13]  David Boud,et al.  THE ROLE OF SELF‐ASSESSMENT IN STUDENT GRADING , 1989 .

[14]  Kei Ohnishi,et al.  Inducing awareness for learners through visualizing mutual evaluation data by a self-organizing map , 2015, 2015 7th International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR).

[15]  Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente,et al.  Peer Assessment and Self-assessment: Effective Learning Tools in Higher Education. , 2014 .

[16]  Richard L. Weaver,et al.  Peer evaluation: A case study , 1986 .