Towards Artificial Neural Network Model To Diagnose Thyroid Problems

Medical diagnosis can be viewed as a pattern classification problem: based a set of input features the goal is to classify a patient as having a particular disorder or as not having it. Thyroid hormone problems are the most prevalent problems nowadays. In this paper an artificial neural network approach is developed using a back propagation algorithm in order to diagnose thyroid problems. It gets a number of factors as input and produces an output which gives the result of whether a person has the problem or is healthy. It is found that back propagation algorithm is proved to be having high sensitivity and specificity. I. I NTRODUCTION edical decision making has become very essential nowadays because of the awareness of various health problems. It can be viewed as a pattern recognition problem whereby various patterns are recognized in order to arrive at a conclusion(1). A group of causing factors of a particular disease or problem is given as inputs. Based on the given input values a decision will be arrived. The decision making can be done using an artificial neural network approach. In this paper thyroid hormonal problems are diagnosed using an artificial neural network approach. The back propagation learning algorithm is used to train the neural network. The efficiency of the network is analyzed. It is concluded to enhance the algorithm for still better results. This paper is organized as sections as follows: Section II discusses about medical decision making and it's advantages. Section III introduces about thyroid problems due to hormonal activities. Section IV gives brief explanation about neural networks. Section V gives the steps to construct a neural network for thyroid diseases diagnosis. Section VI analyses the given back propagation algorithm. Section VII concludes the article giving future directions.

[1]  Margo I. Seltzer,et al.  The case for application-specific benchmarking , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems.

[2]  Diane Tang,et al.  Benchmarking Filesystems , 1995 .

[3]  Sara McMains,et al.  File System Logging versus Clustering: A Performance Comparison , 1995, USENIX.

[4]  John K. Ousterhout,et al.  Why Aren't Operating Systems Getting Faster As Fast as Hardware? , 1990, USENIX Summer.

[5]  Mendel Rosenblum,et al.  The design and implementation of a log-structured file system , 1991, SOSP '91.

[6]  Daniel Pierre Bovet,et al.  Understanding the Linux Kernel , 2000 .

[7]  Arvin Park,et al.  IOStone: a synthetic file system benchmark , 1990, CARN.

[8]  Thomas Ruwart File System Benchmarks, Then, Now, and Tomorrow , 2001, 2001 Eighteenth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies.

[9]  María Josefa Somodevilla García,et al.  H-Tree: A data structure for fast path-retrieval in rooted trees. , 2007, Eighth Mexican International Conference on Current Trends in Computer Science (ENC 2007).

[10]  Nikolai Joukov,et al.  A nine year study of file system and storage benchmarking , 2008, TOS.

[11]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Performance Evaluation and Monitoring , 1971, CSUR.

[12]  Guan Haibing,et al.  FATTY: A Reliable FAT File System , 2007, 10th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design Architectures, Methods and Tools (DSD 2007).

[13]  Stephen C. Tweedie,et al.  Journaling the Linux ext2fs Filesystem , 2008 .

[14]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  Scale and performance in a distributed file system , 1987, SOSP '87.

[15]  Wasim Ahmad Bhat Review of FAT data structure of FAT32 file system , 2010 .