Participation: 'Bounded Freedom' or Hidden Constraints on User Involvement

User participation in information systems development is often surrounded by assumptions that the resultant system will be a success, will reflect user needs, and that the process results in an empowered workforce. This paper argues that underlying these foreground rational assumptions are instrumental, politically motivated justifications driving the need to involve users.

[1]  R. Boland,et al.  Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives , 1983 .

[2]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  No Silver Bullet: Essence and Accidents of Software Engineering , 1987 .

[4]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to , 2002 .

[5]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[6]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[7]  Steve Smithson,et al.  An exploratory study of information systems in support of employee empowerment , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[8]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[9]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Computer systems in work design--the ETHICS method : effective technical and human implementation of computer systems , 1979 .

[10]  David G. Novick,et al.  Participatory conversation in PD , 1993, CACM.

[11]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  Integrating case study and survey research methods: an example in information systems , 1994 .

[12]  Gerhard Schmidt,et al.  Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[14]  Martin Beirne,et al.  Participating informally: Opportunities and dilemmas in user-driven design , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Power in and Around Organizations , 1983 .

[16]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[17]  P. Asaro.  Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[18]  Stuart W. Leslie,et al.  Forces of production : a social history of industrial automation , 1985 .

[19]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality , 1998 .

[20]  Frederick M. Nickols,et al.  Empowerment: The Emperor's New Clothes , 1998 .

[21]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  User Involvement in Information Systems Development: the Problem of Finding the 'Right' User , 1997, ECIS.

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[24]  John Leslie King.  Commentary on "Research on Information Systems Development in Scandinavia: Unity in Plurality" , 1998, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The reality of participative systems design: contributing to stability in a rocking boat , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations , 2011 .

[27]  Chris Westrup,et al.  Knowledge, legitimacy and progress? Requirements as inscriptions in information systems development , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[29]  Gerald M. Weinberg,et al.  Computer Systems Development: History Organization and Implementation , 1991 .

[30]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[31]  Cynthia Mathis Beath,et al.  The Contradictory Structure of Systems Development Methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-User Relationship in Information Engineering , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  M. Konovsky.  The New Leadership: Managing Participation in Organizations , 1988 .

[33]  Nathalie N. Mitev,et al.  Understanding Information System Failures from the Complexity Perspective , 2008 .

[34]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[35]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction , 1997 .

[36]  Finn Kensing,et al.  PD: structure in the toolbox , 1993, CACM.

[37]  C. Avgerou.  Information Systems and Global Diversity , 2002 .

[38]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts , 1996, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Bringing Design to Software , 1996 .

[40]  Erran Carmel,et al.  American Software Hegemony in Packaged Software and 'the Culture Software' , 1997, Inf. Soc..

[41]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis , 1995 .

[42]  Martin Beirne,et al.  Developments in Computing Work: Control and Contradiction in the Software Labour Process , 1998 .

[43]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  User participation in system development revisited , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[44]  Graham Tate,et al.  A study of user participation in information systems development , 1994, J. Inf. Technol..

[45]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah,et al.  User involvement and user satisfaction: An exploratory contingency model , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[46]  Ron Weber,et al.  System designers' user models: a comparitive study and methodological critique , 1983, CACM.

[47]  Andrew Clement,et al.  A retrospective look at PD projects , 1993, CACM.

[48]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Management Consultants: Systems Development, Power and the Translation of Problems , 1992 .

[49]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[50]  Michael Newman,et al.  Some fallacies in information systems development , 1989 .

[51]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[52]  Tsang-Hsiung Lee,et al.  The Effects Of User Participation On System Success: Toward A Contingency Theory Of User Satisfaction , 1991, ICIS.

[53]  Michael Newman,et al.  User Involvement as an Interaction Process: A Case Study , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Socio-technical Design: An Unfulfilled Promise or a Future Opportunity , 2000, Organizational and Social Perspectives on IT.

[55]  Blake Ives,et al.  User Involvement in System Design: An Empirical Test of Alternative Approaches , 1981, Inf. Manag..

[56]  R. Hirschheim,et al.  Requirements analysis: a new look at an old topic , 1988 .

[57]  Ina Wagner,et al.  A web of fuzzy problems: confronting the ethical issues , 1993, CACM.

[58]  B WhiteKathy,et al.  User involvement and user satisfaction , 1993 .

[59]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Four paradigms of information systems development , 1989, CACM.

[60]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[61]  Bernhard Wilpert,et al.  Organizational Participation: Myth and Reality , 1998 .

[62]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Information Systems and User Resistance: Theory and Practice , 1988, Comput. J..

[63]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Organizational context, social interpretation, and the implementation and consequences of geographic information systems☆ , 1996 .

[64]  P. Beynon-Davies,et al.  Information systems ‘failure’: the case of the London Ambulance Service's Computer Aided Despatch project , 1995 .

[65]  James E. Hunton,et al.  Effects of User Participation in Systems Development: A Longitudinal Field Experiment , 1997, MIS Q..

[66]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Research on information systems development in Scandinavia—unity in plurality , 1998 .