Metacognition in Action: The Importance of Implementation Intentions

When people furnish their goal intentions (“I intend to attain the goal x!”) with implementation intentions (“I will initiate the goal-directed response y when situation z arises!”), the initiation of goal-directed responses becomes automatized. As this type of automaticity stems from a single act of will, it is referred to as strategic automaticity. We report various studies demonstrating that strategic automaticity leads to immediate and efficient responding, which does not need a conscious intent. In addition, the situational cues specified in implementation intentions seem to be easily detected and readily attended to. Further research indicates that the strategic automaticity induced by implementation intentions also helps resist temptations and fight bad habits. Following Nelson's (1996; Nelson & Narens, 1994) model of metacognition, we suggest that goal intentions and, in particular, implementation intentions are important components of the metacognitive control of action geared toward its initiation, continuation, and termination.

[1]  J. Bargh,et al.  The psychology of action : linking cognition and motivation to behavior , 1999 .

[2]  J. Bargh The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. , 1999 .

[3]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Stereotype activation and inhibition , 2013 .

[4]  Paul Karoly Expanding the conceptual range of health self-regulation research: A commentary , 1998 .

[5]  P. Sheeran,et al.  Implementation Intentions and the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit , 1997 .

[7]  J. Bargh The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[8]  M. Banaji,et al.  Automatic and Controlled Processes in Stereotype Priming , 1996 .

[9]  T. O. Nelson Consciousness and metacognition. , 1996 .

[10]  P. Gollwitzer The Volitional Benefits of Planning , 1996 .

[11]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Goal Effects on Action and Cognition , 1996 .

[12]  A G Greenwald,et al.  Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Bargh The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[14]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. , 1994 .

[15]  W. Fleeson,et al.  Social intelligence and intelligent goal pursuit: a cognitive slice of motivation. , 1994, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[16]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  Why investigate metacognition , 1994 .

[17]  P. Gollwitzer Goal Achievement: The Role of Intentions , 1993 .

[18]  J Metcalfe Novelty monitoring, metacognition, and control in a composite holographic associative recall model: implications for Korsakoff amnesia. , 1993, Psychological review.

[19]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. Bargh The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[21]  S. Rose Selective attention , 1992, Nature.

[22]  J. Bargh,et al.  Stereotyping based on apparently individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. , 1991 .

[23]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  A Continuum of Impression Formation, from Category-Based to Individuating Processes: Influences of Information and Motivation on Attention and Interpretation , 1990 .

[24]  P. Devine Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[25]  J. Brehm,et al.  Energization and goal attractiveness. , 1989 .

[26]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources. , 1989 .

[27]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[28]  H. Heckhausen,et al.  Efficiency under record performance demands: exertion control--an individual difference variable? , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  J. Bargh,et al.  Social cognition and social perception. , 1987, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[31]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  D. Hamilton,et al.  Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach. , 1986 .

[33]  R. Baumeister Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  J. Kuhl,et al.  Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: toward a comprehensive theory of action control. , 1984, Progress in experimental personality research.

[35]  J. Bargh Attention and Automaticity in the Processing of Self-Relevant Information , 1982 .

[36]  T. Shallice Specific impairments of planning. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[37]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Symbolic self-completion , 1982 .

[38]  A. Bandura,et al.  Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. , 1981 .

[39]  T. K. Srull,et al.  The Role of Category Accessibility in the Interpretation of Information About Persons: Some Determinants and Implications , 1979 .

[40]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[41]  W. Mischel,et al.  Effects of temptation-inhibiting and task-facilitating plans on self-control. , 1976 .

[42]  D. Zillmann,et al.  Effect of timing of information about mitigating circumstances on emotional responses to provocation and retaliatory behavior , 1976 .

[43]  H. A. Witkin Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. , 1950, Journal of personality.

[44]  Kurt Gottschaldt,et al.  Über den Einfluß der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren , 1926 .